Literature DB >> 20356884

Breaking the trade-off: rainforest bats maximize bandwidth and repetition rate of echolocation calls as they approach prey.

Daniela A Schmieder1, Tigga Kingston, Rosli Hashim, Björn M Siemers.   

Abstract

Both mammals and birds experience a performance trade-off between producing vocalizations with high bandwidths and at high repetition rate. Echolocating bats drastically increase repetition rate from 2-20 calls s(-1) up to about 170 calls s(-1) prior to intercepting airborne prey in order to accurately track prey movement. In turn, bandwidth drops to about 10-30 kHz for the calls of this 'final buzz'. We have now discovered that Southeast Asian rainforest bats (in the vespertilionid subfamilies Kerivoulinae and Murininae) are able to maintain high call bandwidths at very high repetition rates throughout approach to prey. Five species of Kerivoula and Phoniscus produced call bandwidths of between 78 and 170 kHz at repetition rates of 140-200 calls s(-1) and two of Murina at 80 calls s(-1). The 'typical' and distinct drop in call frequency was present in none of the seven species. This stands in striking contrast to our present view of echolocation during approach to prey in insectivorous bats, which was established largely based on European and American members of the same bat family, the Vespertilionidae. Buzz calls of Kerivoula pellucida had mean bandwidths of 170 kHz and attained maximum starting frequencies of 250 kHz which makes them the most broadband and most highly pitched tonal animal vocalization known to date. We suggest that the extreme vocal performance of the Kerivoulinae and Murininae evolved as an adaptation to echolocating and tracking arthropods in the dense rainforest understorey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20356884      PMCID: PMC2936139          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  5 in total

1.  Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  A Surlykke; C F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song.

Authors:  Tudor I Drăgănoiu; Laurent Nagle; Michel Kreutzer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Aerial hawking and landing: approach behaviour in Natterer's bats, Myotis nattereri (Kuhl 1818).

Authors:  Mariana L Melcón; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Echolocation behaviour and prey-capture success in foraging bats: laboratory and field experiments on Myotis daubentonii.

Authors:  A R Britton; G Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.312

  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  Parallel signatures of sequence evolution among hearing genes in echolocating mammals: an emerging model of genetic convergence.

Authors:  K T J Davies; J A Cotton; J D Kirwan; E C Teeling; S J Rossiter
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Hawkmoths produce anti-bat ultrasound.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  How the bat got its buzz.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; Coen P H Elemans; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Echolocation behaviour of Megaderma lyra during typical orientation situations and while hunting aerial prey: a field study.

Authors:  Sabine Schmidt; Wipula Yapa; Jan-Eric Grunwald
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Dynamics of the echolocation beam during prey pursuit in aerial hawking bats.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Mads Nedergaard Olsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Echolocating bats rely on an innate speed-of-sound reference.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Divergent evolutionary rates in vertebrate and mammalian specific conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) in echolocating mammals.

Authors:  Kalina T J Davies; Georgia Tsagkogeorga; Stephen J Rossiter
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Finding flowers in the dark: nectar-feeding bats integrate olfaction and echolocation while foraging for nectar.

Authors:  Tania P Gonzalez-Terrazas; Carlos Martel; Paulo Milet-Pinheiro; Manfred Ayasse; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Marco Tschapka
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Bats pre-adapt sensory acquisition according to target distance prior to takeoff even in the presence of closer background objects.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evolutionary origins of ultrasonic hearing and laryngeal echolocation in bats inferred from morphological analyses of the inner ear.

Authors:  Kalina Tj Davies; Ibnu Maryanto; Stephen J Rossiter
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.