Literature DB >> 20727755

An aerial-hawking bat uses stealth echolocation to counter moth hearing.

Holger R Goerlitz1, Hannah M ter Hofstede, Matt R K Zeale, Gareth Jones, Marc W Holderied.   

Abstract

Ears evolved in many nocturnal insects, including some moths, to detect bat echolocation calls and evade capture [1, 2]. Although there is evidence that some bats emit echolocation calls that are inconspicuous to eared moths, it is difficult to determine whether this was an adaptation to moth hearing or originally evolved for a different purpose [2, 3]. Aerial-hawking bats generally emit high-amplitude echolocation calls to maximize detection range [4, 5]. Here we present the first example of an echolocation counterstrategy to overcome prey hearing at the cost of reduced detection distance. We combined comparative bat flight-path tracking and moth neurophysiology with fecal DNA analysis to show that the barbastelle, Barbastella barbastellus, emits calls that are 10 to 100 times lower in amplitude than those of other aerial-hawking bats, remains undetected by moths until close, and captures mainly eared moths. Model calculations demonstrate that only bats emitting such low-amplitude calls hear moth echoes before their calls are conspicuous to moths. This stealth echolocation allows the barbastelle to exploit food resources that are difficult to catch for other aerial-hawking bats emitting calls of greater amplitude.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20727755     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  36 in total

1.  The relative influence of competition and prey defences on the trophic structure of animalivorous bat ensembles.

Authors:  M Corrie Schoeman; David S Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Global warming alters sound transmission: differential impact on the prey detection ability of echolocating bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Klemen Koselj; Sándor Zsebok; Björn M Siemers; Holger R Goerlitz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.

Authors:  Emanuel C Mora; Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Frank Macías-Escrivá; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Evolution of directional hearing in moths via conversion of bat detection devices to asymmetric pressure gradient receivers.

Authors:  Andrew Reid; Thibaut Marin-Cudraz; James F C Windmill; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How the bat got its buzz.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; Coen P H Elemans; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Transposable elements and small RNAs: Genomic fuel for species diversity.

Authors:  Federico G Hoffmann; Liam P McGuire; Brian A Counterman; David A Ray
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2015-07-24

7.  Decision making in the face of a deadly predator: high-amplitude behavioural thresholds can be adaptive for rainforest crickets under high background noise levels.

Authors:  Heiner Römer; Marc Holderied
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Dynamics of the echolocation beam during prey pursuit in aerial hawking bats.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Mads Nedergaard Olsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Inconspicuous echolocation in hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus).

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Theodore J Weller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  PRINCIPLES AND PATTERNS OF BAT MOVEMENTS: FROM AERODYNAMICS TO ECOLOGY.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Winifred F Frick; Marc W Holderied; Richard Holland; Gerald Kerth; Marco A R Mello; Raina K Plowright; Sharon Swartz; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.