Literature DB >> 20643943

Vespertilionid bats control the width of their biosonar sound beam dynamically during prey pursuit.

Lasse Jakobsen1, Annemarie Surlykke.   

Abstract

Animals using sound for communication emit directional signals, focusing most acoustic energy in one direction. Echolocating bats are listening for soft echoes from insects. Therefore, a directional biosonar sound beam greatly increases detection probability in the forward direction and decreases off-axis echoes. However, high directionality has context-specific disadvantages: at close range the detection space will be vastly reduced, making a broad beam favorable. Hence, a flexible system would be very advantageous. We investigated whether bats can dynamically change directionality of their biosonar during aerial pursuit of insects. We trained five Myotis daubentonii and one Eptesicus serotinus to capture tethered mealworms and recorded their echolocation signals with a multimicrophone array. The results show that the bats broaden the echolocation beam drastically in the terminal phase of prey pursuit. M. daubentonii increased the half-amplitude angle from approximately 40 degrees to approximately 90 degrees horizontally and from approximately 45 degrees to more than 90 degrees vertically. The increase in beam width is achieved by lowering the frequency by roughly one octave from approximately 55 kHz to approximately 27.5 kHz. The E. serotinus showed beam broadening remarkably similar to that of M. daubentonii. Our results demonstrate dynamic control of beam width in both species. Hence, we propose directionality as an explanation for the frequency decrease observed in the buzz of aerial hawking vespertilionid bats. We predict that future studies will reveal dynamic control of beam width in a broad range of acoustically communicating animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643943      PMCID: PMC2922241          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006630107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

1.  The sound emission pattern and the acoustical role of the noseleaf in the echolocating bat, Carollia perspicillata.

Authors:  D J Hartley; R A Suthers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustical beam patterns for bats: some theoretical considerations.

Authors:  G K Strother; M Mogus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M B Fenton; M J O'Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Acoustic scanning of natural scenes by echolocation in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Kaushik Ghose; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Mysterious Mystacina: how the New Zealand short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) locates insect prey.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Peter I Webb; Jane A Sedgeley; Colin F J O'Donnell
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Substrate-gleaning versus aerial-hawking: plasticity in the foraging and echolocation behaviour of the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis.

Authors:  P A Faure; R M Barclay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Echolocation behaviour and prey-capture success in foraging bats: laboratory and field experiments on Myotis daubentonii.

Authors:  A R Britton; G Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Directional sensitivity of echolocation system in bats producing frequency-modulated signals.

Authors:  T Shimozawa; N Suga; P Hendler; S Schuetze
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Active listening for spatial orientation in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Kari Bohn; Hannah Gilkenson; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Simon Boel Pedersen; Lasse Jakobsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  43 in total

1.  Echolocation behavior of the Japanese horseshoe bat in pursuit of fluttering prey.

Authors:  Shigeki Mantani; Shizuko Hiryu; Emyo Fujioka; Naohiro Matsuta; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Bats adjust their mouth gape to zoom their biosonar field of view.

Authors:  Pavel Kounitsky; Jens Rydell; Eran Amichai; Arjan Boonman; Ofri Eitan; Anthony J Weiss; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fast sensory-motor reactions in echolocating bats to sudden changes during the final buzz and prey intercept.

Authors:  Cornelia Geberl; Signe Brinkløv; Lutz Wiegrebe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Convergent acoustic field of view in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; John M Ratcliffe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  How the bat got its buzz.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; Coen P H Elemans; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  Adaptive vocal behavior drives perception by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Chen Chiu; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Echolocating bats use future-target information for optimal foraging.

Authors:  Emyo Fujioka; Ikkyu Aihara; Miwa Sumiya; Kazuyuki Aihara; Shizuko Hiryu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Clutter and conspecifics: a comparison of their influence on echolocation and flight behaviour in Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentonii.

Authors:  Kayleigh Fawcett; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.