Literature DB >> 25775538

Fast sensory-motor reactions in echolocating bats to sudden changes during the final buzz and prey intercept.

Cornelia Geberl1, Signe Brinkløv2, Lutz Wiegrebe1, Annemarie Surlykke3.   

Abstract

Echolocation is an active sense enabling bats and toothed whales to orient in darkness through echo returns from their ultrasonic signals. Immediately before prey capture, both bats and whales emit a buzz with such high emission rates (≥ 180 Hz) and overall duration so short that its functional significance remains an enigma. To investigate sensory-motor control during the buzz of the insectivorous bat Myotis daubentonii, we removed prey, suspended in air or on water, before expected capture. The bats responded by shortening their echolocation buzz gradually; the earlier prey was removed down to approximately 100 ms (30 cm) before expected capture, after which the full buzz sequence was emitted both in air and over water. Bats trawling over water also performed the full capture behavior, but in-air capture motions were aborted, even at very late prey removals (<20 ms = 6 cm before expected contact). Thus, neither the buzz nor capture movements are stereotypical, but dynamically adapted based on sensory feedback. The results indicate that echolocation is controlled mainly by acoustic feedback, whereas capture movements are adjusted according to both acoustic and somatosensory feedback, suggesting separate (but coordinated) central motor control of the two behaviors based on multimodal input. Bat echolocation, especially the terminal buzz, provides a unique window to extremely fast decision processes in response to sensory feedback and modulation through attention in a naturally behaving animal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bat; buzz; decision; echolocation; sensory motor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25775538      PMCID: PMC4386384          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1424457112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Superfast muscles set maximum call rate in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Coen P H Elemans; Andrew F Mead; Lasse Jakobsen; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Control of sensorimotor variability by consequences.

Authors:  Laurent Madelain; Lucie Champrenaut; Alan Chauvin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  ECHOLOCATION BY BLIND MEN, BATS AND RADAR.

Authors:  D R Griffin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1944-12-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Functional convergence in bat and toothed whale biosonars.

Authors:  P T Madsen; A Surlykke
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-09

5.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; William E Conner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  How the bat got its buzz.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; Coen P H Elemans; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Foraging Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) produce distinct click types matched to different phases of echolocation.

Authors:  M Johnson; P T Madsen; W M X Zimmer; N Aguilar de Soto; P L Tyack
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Equal latency contours and auditory weighting functions for the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Paul J Wensveen; Léonie A E Huijser; Lean Hoek; Ronald A Kastelein
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Aerodynamics of manoeuvring flight in brown long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus).

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Lasse Jakobsen; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Adaptive learning and recall of motor-sensory sequences in adult echolocating bats.

Authors:  Mor Taub; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  Sensory error drives fine motor adjustment.

Authors:  Huimin Wang; Yuxuan Zhou; Huanhuan Li; Cynthia F Moss; Xingxing Li; Jinhong Luo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Inconspicuous echolocation in hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus).

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Theodore J Weller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sonar sound groups and increased terminal buzz duration reflect task complexity in hunting bats.

Authors:  Katrine Hulgard; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Fishing Technique of Long-Fingered Bats Was Developed from a Primary Reaction to Disappearing Target Stimuli.

Authors:  Ostaizka Aizpurua; Antton Alberdi; Joxerra Aihartza; Inazio Garin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bats pre-adapt sensory acquisition according to target distance prior to takeoff even in the presence of closer background objects.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reduction of emission level in approach signals of greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis): No evidence for a closed loop control system for intensity compensation.

Authors:  Tobias Budenz; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spike Train Similarity Space (SSIMS) Method Detects Effects of Obstacle Proximity and Experience on Temporal Patterning of Bat Biosonar.

Authors:  Alyssa W Accomando; Carlos E Vargas-Irwin; James A Simmons
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.