Literature DB >> 26080398

Dynamics of the echolocation beam during prey pursuit in aerial hawking bats.

Lasse Jakobsen1, Mads Nedergaard Olsen2, Annemarie Surlykke2.   

Abstract

In the evolutionary arms race between prey and predator, measures and countermeasures continuously evolve to increase survival on both sides. Bats and moths are prime examples. When exposed to intense ultrasound, eared moths perform dramatic escape behaviors. Vespertilionid and rhinolophid bats broaden their echolocation beam in the final stage of pursuit, presumably as a countermeasure to keep evading moths within their "acoustic field of view." In this study, we investigated if dynamic beam broadening is a general property of echolocation when catching moving prey. We recorded three species of emballonurid bats, Saccopteryx bilineata, Saccopteryx leptura, and Rhynchonycteris naso, catching airborne insects in the field. The study shows that S. bilineata and S. leptura maintain a constant beam shape during the entire prey pursuit, whereas R. naso broadens the beam by lowering the peak call frequency from 100 kHz during search and approach to 67 kHz in the buzz. Surprisingly, both Saccopteryx bats emit calls with very high energy throughout the pursuit, up to 60 times more than R. naso and Myotis daubentonii (a similar sized vespertilionid), providing them with as much, or more, peripheral "vision" than the vespertilionids, but ensonifying objects far ahead suggesting more clutter. Thus, beam broadening is not a fundamental property of the echolocation system. However, based on the results, we hypothesize that increased peripheral detection is crucial to all aerial hawking bats in the final stages of prey pursuit and speculate that beam broadening is a feature characterizing more advanced echolocation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bat; buzz; directionality; echolocation; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26080398      PMCID: PMC4491789          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419943112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

Review 1.  Causes and consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  An aerial-hawking bat uses stealth echolocation to counter moth hearing.

Authors:  Holger R Goerlitz; Hannah M ter Hofstede; Matt R K Zeale; Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Vespertilionid bats control the width of their biosonar sound beam dynamically during prey pursuit.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How the bat got its buzz.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; Coen P H Elemans; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M B Fenton; M J O'Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Echolocation in Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris).

Authors:  P T Madsen; N Aguilar de Soto; P Arranz; M Johnson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: behavioural experiments on the European 'trawling' bats Myotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme and M. daubentonii.

Authors:  B M Siemers; P Stilz; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Range-dependent flexibility in the acoustic field of view of echolocating porpoises (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Danuta M Wisniewska; John M Ratcliffe; Kristian Beedholm; Christian B Christensen; Mark Johnson; Jens C Koblitz; Magnus Wahlberg; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Noseleaf dynamics during pulse emission in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Lin Feng; Li Gao; Hongwang Lu; Rolf Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  TrackUSF, a novel tool for automated ultrasonic vocalization analysis, reveals modified calls in a rat model of autism.

Authors:  Shai Netser; Guy Nahardiya; Gili Weiss-Dicker; Roei Dadush; Yizhaq Goussha; Shanah Rachel John; Mor Taub; Yuval Werber; Nir Sapir; Yossi Yovel; Hala Harony-Nicolas; Joseph D Buxbaum; Lior Cohen; Koby Crammer; Shlomo Wagner
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 7.364

2.  Auditory opportunity and visual constraint enabled the evolution of echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Jeneni Thiagavel; Clément Cechetto; Sharlene E Santana; Lasse Jakobsen; Eric J Warrant; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Representation of three-dimensional space in the auditory cortex of the echolocating bat P. discolor.

Authors:  Wolfgang Greiter; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Coordinated Control of Acoustical Field of View and Flight in Three-Dimensional Space for Consecutive Capture by Echolocating Bats during Natural Foraging.

Authors:  Miwa Sumiya; Emyo Fujioka; Kazuya Motoi; Masaru Kondo; Shizuko Hiryu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities.

Authors:  Tessa A Rhinehart; Lauren M Chronister; Trieste Devlin; Justin Kitzes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Hunting bats adjust their echolocation to receive weak prey echoes for clutter reduction.

Authors:  Laura Stidsholt; Stefan Greif; Holger R Goerlitz; Kristian Beedholm; Jamie Macaulay; Mark Johnson; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Bio-acoustic tracking and localization using heterogeneous, scalable microphone arrays.

Authors:  Erik Verreycken; Ralph Simon; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Walter Daems; Jesse Barber; Jan Steckel
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-11-10

8.  Sonar beam dynamics in leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Species-specific control of acoustic gaze by echolocating bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon and Pipistrellus abramus, during flight.

Authors:  Yasufumi Yamada; Shizuko Hiryu; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.