Literature DB >> 35704762

Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Jesse R Barber1, David Plotkin2, Juliette J Rubin2,3, Nicholas T Homziak2, Brian C Leavell1, Peter R Houlihan2,3, Krystie A Miner1, Jesse W Breinholt2,4, Brandt Quirk-Royal1, Pablo Sebastián Padrón2,5, Matias Nunez6,7,8, Akito Y Kawahara2.   

Abstract

Warning signals are well known in the visual system, but rare in other modalities. Some moths produce ultrasonic sounds to warn bats of noxious taste or to mimic unpalatable models. Here, we report results from a long-term study across the globe, assaying moth response to playback of bat echolocation. We tested 252 genera, spanning most families of large-bodied moths, and document anti-bat ultrasound production in 52 genera, with eight subfamily origins described. Based on acoustic analysis of ultrasonic emissions and palatability experiments with bats, it seems that acoustic warning and mimicry are the raison d'être for sound production in most moths. However, some moths use high-duty-cycle ultrasound capable of jamming bat sonar. In fact, we find preliminary evidence of independent origins of sonar jamming in at least six subfamilies. Palatability data indicate that jamming and warning are not mutually exclusive strategies. To explore the possible organization of anti-bat warning sounds into acoustic mimicry rings, we intensively studied a community of moths in Ecuador and, using machine-learning approaches, found five distinct acoustic clusters. While these data represent an early understanding of acoustic aposematism and mimicry across this megadiverse insect order, it is likely that ultrasonically signaling moths comprise one of the largest mimicry complexes on earth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic mimicry; antipredator defense; biodiversity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35704762      PMCID: PMC9231501          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2117485119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  48 in total

1.  MOTH SOUNDS AND THE INSECT-CATCHING BEHAVIOR OF BATS.

Authors:  D C DUNNING; K D ROEDER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evasive mimicry: when (if ever) could mimicry based on difficulty of capture evolve?

Authors:  G D Ruxton; M Speed; T N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Nickolay I Hristov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Toward a Predictive Framework for Convergent Evolution: Integrating Natural History, Genetic Mechanisms, and Consequences for the Diversity of Life.

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Tiger moth responses to a simulated bat attack: timing and duty cycle.

Authors:  J R Barber; W E Conner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth?

Authors:  Nigel E Stork
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 19.686

7.  Tiger moth jams bat sonar.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Jesse R Barber; William E Conner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Hearing with the mouthparts: behavioural responses and the structural basis of ultrasound perception in acherontiine hawkmoths

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Jamming bat echolocation: the dogbane tiger moth Cycnia tenera times its clicks to the terminal attack calls of the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J H Fullard; J A Simmons; P A Saillant
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Fireflies thwart bat attack with multisensory warnings.

Authors:  Brian C Leavell; Juliette J Rubin; Christopher J W McClure; Krystie A Miner; Marc A Branham; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; David Plotkin; Juliette J Rubin; Nicholas T Homziak; Brian C Leavell; Peter R Houlihan; Krystie A Miner; Jesse W Breinholt; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Pablo Sebastián Padrón; Matias Nunez; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.