Literature DB >> 23299859

Voice conversion in cochlear implantation.

Eric P Wilkinson1, Ossama Abdel-Hamid, John J Galvin, Hui Jiang, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Voice conversion algorithms may benefit cochlear implant (CI) users who better understand speech produced by one talker than by another. It is unclear how the source or target talker's fundamental frequency (F0) information may contribute to perception of converted speech. This study evaluated voice conversion algorithms for CI users in which the source or target talker's F0 was included in the converted speech. STUDY
DESIGN: Development and evaluation of computerized voice conversion algorithms in CI patients.
METHODS: A series of cepstral analysis-based algorithms were developed and evaluated in six CI users. The algorithms converted talker voice gender (male-to-female, or female-to-male); either the source or target talker F0 was included in the converted speech. The voice conversion algorithms were evaluated in terms of recognition of IEEE sentences, speech quality, and voice gender discrimination.
RESULTS: Voice gender recognition performance showed that listeners strongly cued to the F0 that was included within the converted speech. For both IEEE sentence recognition and voice quality ratings, performance was poorer with the voice conversion algorithms than with original speech. Performance on female-to-male conversion was superior to male-to-female conversion.
CONCLUSION: The strong cueing to F0 within the voice conversion algorithms suggests that CI users are able to utilize temporal periodicity information for some pitch-related tasks. Limitations on spectral channel information experienced by CI users may result in poorer performance with voice conversion algorithms due to distortion of speech formant information and degradation of the spectral envelope.
Copyright © 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23299859      PMCID: PMC3615081          DOI: 10.1002/lary.23744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  12 in total

1.  Speaker recognition with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Michael Vongphoe; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

3.  Speaker normalization for chinese vowel recognition in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi-ping Chang; Qian-jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effect of spectral normalization on different talker speech recognition by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chuping Liu; John Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-04

8.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; Etienne Gaudrain; Jeanne N Clarke; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-30

2.  Quantifying Cochlear Implant Users' Ability for Speaker Identification using CI Auditory Stimuli.

Authors:  Nursadul Mamun; Ria Ghosh; John H L Hansen
Journal:  Interspeech       Date:  2019-09

3.  Normal-Hearing Listeners' and Cochlear Implant Users' Perception of Pitch Cues in Emotional Speech.

Authors:  Steven Gilbers; Christina Fuller; Dicky Gilbers; Mirjam Broersma; Martijn Goudbeek; Rolien Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-10-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.