Literature DB >> 18529199

Effect of spectral normalization on different talker speech recognition by cochlear implant users.

Chuping Liu1, John Galvin, Qian-Jie Fu, Shrikanth S Narayanan.   

Abstract

In cochlear implants (CIs), different talkers often produce different levels of speech understanding because of the spectrally distorted speech patterns provided by the implant device. A spectral normalization approach was used to transform the spectral characteristics of one talker to those of another talker. In Experiment 1, speech recognition with two talkers was measured in CI users, with and without spectral normalization. Results showed that the spectral normalization algorithm had small but significant effect on performance. In Experiment 2, the effects of spectral normalization were measured in CI users and normal-hearing (NH) subjects; a pitch-stretching technique was used to simulate six talkers with different fundamental frequencies and vocal tract configurations. NH baseline performance was nearly perfect with these pitch-shift transformations. For CI subjects, while there was considerable intersubject variability in performance with the different pitch-shift transformations, spectral normalization significantly improved the intelligibility of these simulated talkers. The results from Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that spectral normalization toward more-intelligible talkers significantly improved CI users' speech understanding with less-intelligible talkers. The results suggest that spectral normalization using optimal reference patterns for individual CI patients may compensate for some of the acoustic variability across talkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18529199      PMCID: PMC2676177          DOI: 10.1121/1.2897047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Elsa Del Rio; Ann R Bradlow; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.017

4.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  What information enables a listener to map a talker's vowel space?

Authors:  R R Verbrugge; W Strange; D P Shankweiler; T R Edman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Vowel identification: orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects.

Authors:  P F Assmann; T M Nearey; J T Hogan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Performance by cortical lesion patients on 40 and 60% time-compressed materials.

Authors:  S Kurdziel; D Noffsinger; W Olsen
Journal:  J Am Audiol Soc       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug

10.  Talker intelligibility differences in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Tim Green; Sotira Katiri; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effects of speaking style on speech intelligibility for Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Yongxin Li; Guoping Zhang; Hou-yong Kang; Sha Liu; Deming Han; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Voice conversion in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Eric P Wilkinson; Ossama Abdel-Hamid; John J Galvin; Hui Jiang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Effects of Within-Talker Variability on Speech Intelligibility in Mandarin-Speaking Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Qiaotong Su; John J Galvin; Guoping Zhang; Yongxin Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.