Literature DB >> 23231276

Comprehensive assessment of the slice sensitivity profiles in breast tomosynthesis and breast CT.

Anita Nosratieh1, Kai Yang, Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri, John M Boone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study experimentally evaluated the slice sensitivity profile (SSP) and its relationship between acquisition angle, object size, and cone angle. The sensitivity profile metric was used to characterize a breast tomosynthesis system's resolution in the z-axis. The SSP was also measured on a prototype breast computed tomography (bCT) system.
METHODS: The SSP was measured using brass disks placed within adipose tissue-equivalent breast phantoms. The digital tomosynthesis system (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic Corporation, Bedford, MA) acquires projection images over a 15° angular range and the bCT scanner acquires projection images over a 360° angular range. Angular ranges between 15° and 360° were studied by using a subset of the projection images acquired on the bCT scanner. The SSP was determined by measuring a background-corrected mean gray scale value as a function of the z-position (axis normal to the plane of the detector).
RESULTS: The results show that SSP improves when the angular acquisition range is increased and the SSP approaches a delta function for angles greater than 180°. Smaller objects have a narrower SSP and the SSP is not significantly dependent on the cone angle. For a 2.5, 5, 10 mm disk, the full width at half maximum of the SSP was 35, 61, 115 mm, respectively, on the tomosynthesis system (at 15°) and was 0.5 mm for all disk diameters on the bCT scanner (at 360°).
CONCLUSIONS: The SSP is dependent on object size and angular acquisition range. These dependencies are overcome once the angular acquisition range is increased beyond 180°.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231276      PMCID: PMC3524074          DOI: 10.1118/1.4764908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  26 in total

1.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography.

Authors:  S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; S Vedantham; S J Glick; C J D'Orsi; S P Baker; R L Webber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; Karen K Lindfors; Shonket Ray; Shih-Ying Huang; Laurel A Beckett; Wayne L Monsky; John M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Caterina Ghetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Jun Zhou; Yue-Houng Hu; Thomas Mertelmeier; Jasmina Ludwig; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Pat Baldwin
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

7.  Evaluation of z-axis resolution and image noise for nonconstant velocity spiral CT data reconstructed using a weighted 3D filtered backprojection (WFBP) reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Jodie A Christner; Karl Stierstorfer; Andrew N Primak; Christian D Eusemann; Thomas G Flohr; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Craig K Abbey; Anita Nosratieh; Karen K Lindfors; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Experimentally determined spectral optimization for dedicated breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; Shih-Ying Huang; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.

Authors:  Ingvar Andersson; Debra M Ikeda; Sophia Zackrisson; Mark Ruschin; Tony Svahn; Pontus Timberg; Anders Tingberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Avice M O'Connell; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Daniel T Kawakyu-O'Connor
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Travis Johnson; Muqing Lin; Huy Q Le; Justin L Ducote; Min-Ying Su; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluation of the effect of geometry for measuring section thickness in tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Ryohei Fukui; Rie Ishii; Junichi Kishimoto; Shinichiro Yamato; Akira Takahata; Chiyuki Kohama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-20

4.  Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.

Authors:  L Chen; J M Boone; C K Abbey; J Hargreaves; C Bateni; K K Lindfors; K Yang; A Nosratieh; A Hernandez; P Gazi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast.

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Daniel Kolditz; Christian Steiding; Veikko Ruth; Ferdinand Lück; Ann-Christin Rößler; Evelyn Wenkel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Technical evaluation of image quality in synthetic mammograms obtained from 15° and 40° digital breast tomosynthesis in a commercial system: a quantitative comparison.

Authors:  Patrizio Barca; Rocco Lamastra; Raffaele Maria Tucciariello; Antonio Traino; Carolina Marini; Giacomo Aringhieri; Davide Caramella; Maria Evelina Fantacci
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-23

7.  Microcalcification detectability using a bench-top prototype photon-counting breast CT based on a Si strip detector.

Authors:  Hyo-Min Cho; Huanjun Ding; William C Barber; Jan S Iwanczyk; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Studies of a prototype linear stationary x-ray source for tomosynthesis imaging.

Authors:  P R Schwoebel; John M Boone; Joe Shao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples.

Authors:  Avice M O'Connell; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Variation in digital breast tomosynthesis image quality at differing heights above the detector.

Authors:  Rob Davidson; Khaled Al Khalifah; Abel Zhou
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-12-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.