Literature DB >> 25199995

The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples.

Avice M O'Connell1, Andrew Karellas, Srinivasan Vedantham.   

Abstract

Mammography is the gold standard in routine screening for the detection of breast cancer in the general population. However, limitations in sensitivity, particularly in dense breasts, has motivated the development of alternative imaging techniques such as digital breast tomosynthesis, whole breast ultrasound, breast-specific gamma imaging, and more recently dedicated breast computed tomography or "breast CT". Virtually all diagnostic work-ups of asymptomatic nonpalpable findings arise from screening mammography. In most cases, diagnostic mammography and ultrasound are sufficient for diagnosis, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) playing an occasional role. Digital breast tomosynthesis, a limited-angle tomographic technique, is increasingly being used for screening. Dedicated breast CT has full three-dimensional (3D) capability with near-isotropic resolution, which could potentially improve diagnostic accuracy. In current dedicated breast CT clinical prototypes, 300-500 low-dose projections are acquired in a circular trajectory around the breast using a flat panel detector, followed by image reconstruction to provide the 3D breast volume. The average glandular dose to the breast from breast CT can range from as little as a two-view screening mammogram to approximately that of a diagnostic mammography examination. Breast CT displays 3D images of the internal structures of the breast; therefore, evaluation of suspicious features like microcalcifications, masses, and asymmetries can be made in multiple anatomical planes from a single scan. The potential role of breast CT for diagnostic imaging is illustrated here through clinical examples such as imaging soft tissue abnormalities and microcalcifications. The potential for breast CT to serve as an imaging tool for extent of disease evaluation and for monitoring neo-adjuvant chemotherapy response is also illustrated.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast; breast CT; cone beam computed tomography; mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25199995      PMCID: PMC4201870          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  48 in total

1.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography.

Authors:  S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; S Vedantham; S P Baker; S J Glick; C J D'Orsi; R L Webber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.

Authors:  Regina J Hooley; Kathryn L Greenberg; Rebecca M Stackhouse; Jaime L Geisel; Reni S Butler; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study.

Authors:  Stephen L Rose; Andra L Tidwell; Louis J Bujnoch; Anne C Kushwaha; Amy S Nordmann; Russell Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rafferty; Jeong Mi Park; Liane E Philpotts; Steven P Poplack; Jules H Sumkin; Elkan F Halpern; Loren T Niklason
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Stephen J Glick; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Avice M O'Connell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Andriy I Bandos; Randi Gullien; Ellen B Eben; Ulrika Ekseth; Unni Haakenaasen; Mina Izadi; Ingvild N Jebsen; Gunnar Jahr; Mona Krager; Loren T Niklason; Solveig Hofvind; David Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  T M Svahn; D P Chakraborty; D Ikeda; S Zackrisson; Y Do; S Mattsson; I Andersson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Margaret M Emmons; Lawrence J Moss; Sarwat Hussain; Stephen P Baker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Avice M O'Connell; David L Conover
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Avice M O'Connell; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Daniel T Kawakyu-O'Connor
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 3.  Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Library based x-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  [Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer : An update].

Authors:  M Funke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  X-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT using a forward-projection model.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Optimization of the energy for Breast monochromatic absorption X-ray Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Pasquale Delogu; Vittorio Di Trapani; Luca Brombal; Giovanni Mettivier; Angelo Taibi; Piernicola Oliva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

10.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis guided Near Infrared Spectroscopy: Volumetric estimates of fibroglandular fraction and breast density from tomosynthesis reconstructions.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Kelly E Michaelsen; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Brian W Pogue; Steven P Poplack; Andrew Karellas; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2015-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.