Literature DB >> 19472626

Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Ioannis Sechopoulos1, Caterina Ghetti.   

Abstract

Digital tomosynthesis of the breast continues to be intensively studied as an adjunct or replacement of conventional mammography. Although many of the acquisition parameters found in tomosynthesis imaging are also found in conventional mammography and therefore most of the traditional values from mammography have been used in the former, two acquisition geometry parameters, the angular range covered during acquisition and the number of projections per projection set, are applicable only to tomosynthesis. Therefore, in the preclinical and clinical studies reported on tomosynthesis of the breast, a wide variety of values have been used for these two parameters. In this study, 63 different combinations of angular range and number of projections were evaluated using computer simulation methods to characterize how these two parameters affect reconstruction quality and to find which of these combinations maximize it. For this, a computer simulation of a digital tomosynthesis system that included empirically determined system response characteristics was developed and used to generate 9450 different breast tissue volume reconstructions. These reconstructions were analyzed objectively using metrics for in-plane lesion visibility and vertical resolution in the form of the contrast-to-noise ratio and artifact spread function (ASF). It was found that although maximizing the angular range covered does always increase the vertical resolution in tomosynthesis, increasing the number of projections in the acquisition set beyond a relatively low threshold does not further improve the vertical resolution. This threshold value for the minimal number of projections needed to minimize the ASF was found to vary proportionally with angular range. For example, for a 60 degrees angular range, the threshold number of projections was found to be 13. Given the clear inverse relationship between the number of projections and in-plane reconstruction quality under a limited total glandular dose condition, the optimum acquisition geometry in tomosynthesis imaging of the breast is that which maximizes the angular range while maintaining the number of projections close to the threshold values found. Finally, of the 63 acquisition geometries studied, the one that resulted in the highest quality reconstruction, considering both in-plane quality and vertical resolution, consisted of the acquisition of 13 projections over a 60 degrees angular range.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19472626     DOI: 10.1118/1.3090889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  28 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Mitch Goodsitt; Paul L Carson; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Andrea Schmitz; Jeffrey W Eberhard; Bernhard E H Claus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images.

Authors:  Sara Vecchio; Achille Albanese; Paolo Vignoli; Angelo Taibi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A novel solid-angle tomosynthesis (SAT) scanning scheme.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Cedric Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Grating-based phase contrast tomosynthesis imaging: proof-of-concept experimental studies.

Authors:  Ke Li; Yongshuai Ge; John Garrett; Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sean D Rose; Adrian A Sanchez; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Synthetic breast phantoms from patient based eigenbreasts.

Authors:  Gregory M Sturgeon; Subok Park; William Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.