Literature DB >> 23222824

Fetal doses to pregnant patients from CT with tube current modulation calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and realistic phantoms.

Jianwei Gu1, X George Xu, Peter F Caracappa, Bob Liu.   

Abstract

To investigate the radiation dose to the fetus using retrospective tube current modulation (TCM) data selected from archived clinical records. This paper describes the calculation of fetal doses using retrospective TCM data and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Three TCM schemes were adopted for use with three pregnant patient phantoms. MC simulations were used to model CT scanners, TCM schemes and pregnant patients. Comparisons between organ doses from TCM schemes and those from non-TCM schemes show that these three TCM schemes reduced fetal doses by 14, 18 and 25 %, respectively. These organ doses were also compared with those from ImPACT calculation. It is found that the difference between the calculated fetal dose and the ImPACT reported dose is as high as 46 %. This work demonstrates methods to study organ doses from various TCM protocols and potential ways to improve the accuracy of CT dose calculation for pregnant patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23222824      PMCID: PMC3670590          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  21 in total

1.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies.

Authors:  M Gies; W A Kalender; H Wolf; C Suess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiation management for interventions using fluoroscopic or computed tomographic guidance during pregnancy: a joint guideline of the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe with Endorsement by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Raymond H Thornton; Donald L Miller; John Damilakis; Robert G Dixon; M Victoria Marx; Beth A Schueler; Eliseo Vañó; Aradhana Venkatesan; Gabriel Bartal; Dimitrios Tsetis; John F Cardella
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Estimated fetal radiation dose from multislice CT studies.

Authors:  J P Felmlee; J E Gray; M L Leetzow; J C Price
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  [Optimization of image quality by CT scanner automatic exposure control systems].

Authors:  Masami Terada
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2005-10-20

5.  A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; C H Cagnon; D D Cody; D M Stevens; C H McCollough; J O'Daniel; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Dose reduction on GE CT scanners.

Authors:  Stanley H Fox; Thomas Toth
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-08-30

7.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Stefania Rizzo; Mannudeep Kalra; Bernhard Schmidt; Tejas Dalal; Christoph Suess; Thomas Flohr; Michael Blake; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  [The smart-scan procedure of spiral computed tomography. A new method for dose reduction].

Authors:  S M Giacomuzzi; B Erckert; T Schöpf; M C Freund; P Springer; A Dessl; W Jaschke
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1996-07

9.  Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. A report of age- and gender-related differences in the anatomical and physiological characteristics of reference individuals. ICRP Publication 89.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2002

10.  Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations.

Authors:  J Damilakis; K Perisinakis; H Vrahoriti; G Kontakis; H Varveris; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Risks to the fetus from diagnostic imaging during pregnancy: review and proposal of a clinical protocol.

Authors:  Mafalda Gomes; Alexandra Matias; Filipe Macedo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-14

2.  Estimation of the radiation dose in pregnancy: an automated patient-specific model using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Tianwu Xie; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparing different methods for estimating radiation dose to the conceptus.

Authors:  X Lopez-Rendon; M S Walgraeve; S Woussen; A Dedulle; G Zhang; H Bosmans; F Zanca
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Clinical indications and radiation doses to the conceptus associated with CT imaging in pregnancy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  S Woussen; X Lopez-Rendon; D Vanbeckevoort; H Bosmans; R Oyen; F Zanca
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.

Authors:  Anthony J Hardy; Erin Angel; Maryam Bostani; Chris Cagnon; Michael McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Radiation doses for pregnant women in the late pregnancy undergoing fetal-computed tomography: a comparison of dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Yuta Matsunaga; Ai Kawaguchi; Masanao Kobayashi; Shigetaka Suzuki; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-09-19

7.  Assessment of CT dose to the fetus and pregnant female patient using patient-specific computational models.

Authors:  Tianwu Xie; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Christoph D Becker; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.