Literature DB >> 12195535

Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations.

J Damilakis1, K Perisinakis, H Vrahoriti, G Kontakis, H Varveris, N Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to estimate the embryo/fetus radiation doses and risks associated with spinal and hip dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans performed on the pregnant mother. The results were compared with the embryo/fetus dose from a thoracolumbar radiograph and pelvic radiograph. Posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine and proximal femur scans during the first, second and third trimesters were performed on a phantom simulating pregnancy at the three trimesters of gestation. All scans were carried out using a Hologic 1000/W pencil beam DXA unit. Moreover, embryo/fetus doses from a (a) thoracolumbar radiograph and (b) pelvic radiograph were estimated for all periods of gestation using the same phantom. Radiation doses were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The dose reduction achievable by shielding the embryo/fetus with a protective apron during DXA scans was studied for all trimesters of gestation. The embryo/fetus doses during the first trimester were measured to be 1.7 mGy and 2.7 mGy for the PA spine and femur DXA scan, respectively, for an embryo/fetus located 8.5 cm from the anterior maternal surface. The risk of excess fatal cancer was 0.2 per million unborn children irradiated in utero for measurements of the spine and 0.3 per million unborn children for measurements of the femur. The embryo/fetus doses during the second and third trimesters were 2.7 mGy and 4.9 mGy respectively for the scans of the lumbar spine. The risk of childhood fatal cancer was 0.3 per million for the second trimester and 0.5 per million for the third trimester. The embryo/fetus radiation doses during the second and third trimesters were estimated as 1.4 mGy and 1.0 mGy respectively for the examinations of the proximal femur. The risk of childhood fatal cancer was 0.1 per million for both trimesters. The use of the apron resulted in a very small change in the dose absorbed by the embryo/fetus. The embryo/fetus dose associated with both DXA modes investigated in the current study is at least 700 times lower in comparison with embryo/fetus dose from a thoracolumbar or pelvic radiograph in all periods of gestation. In conclusion, the embryo/fetus dose in bone density measurements of spine and femur using pencil beam DXA is lower than the average daily natural background in the United States of 8 mGy. The health provider can decide whether a DXA scanning is beneficial to a pregnant woman, taking into account the potential radiation risks to the embryo/fetus presented in the current study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195535     DOI: 10.1007/s001980200098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  11 in total

Review 1.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Quality assurance of imaging techniques used in the clinical management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; J Damilakis; G Solomou; A Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Judith E Adams; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Bone metabolism and osteoporosis during pregnancy and lactation.

Authors:  Abraham Yair Lujano-Negrete; Martha Cecilia Rodríguez-Ruiz; Cassandra Michele Skinner-Taylor; Lorena Perez-Barbosa; Jesus Alberto Cardenas de la Garza; Pedro Alberto García-Hernández; Luis Gerardo Espinosa-Banuelos; Luz Fernanda Gutierrez-Leal; Sofia Jezzini-Martínez; Dionicio Ángel Galarza-Delgado
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Fetal doses to pregnant patients from CT with tube current modulation calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and realistic phantoms.

Authors:  Jianwei Gu; X George Xu; Peter F Caracappa; Bob Liu
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Open interlocked nailing without a targeting device or X-ray guidance for non-union of the femur: a case series.

Authors:  Alfred O Ogbemudia; Anire Bafor; Efosa Igbinovia; Peter E Ogbemudia
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-09-29

Review 7.  Radiation dose from initial trauma assessment and resuscitation: review of the literature.

Authors:  Catherine M Hui; John H MacGregor; Homer C Tien; John B Kortbeek
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Maternal exposure to radiographic exams and major structural birth defects.

Authors:  Hyeyeun Lim; Charles W Beasley; Lawrence W Whitehead; Robert J Emery; A J Agopian; Peter H Langlois; Dorothy K Waller
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-03-22

9.  Estimating the absorbed dose to critical organs during dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M Mokhtari-Dizaji; A A Sharafi; B Larijani; N Mokhlesian; H Hasanzadeh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  Diagnosing cardiac disease during pregnancy: imaging modalities.

Authors:  Ntobeko A Ntusi; Petronella Samuels; Sulaiman Moosa; Ana O Mocumbi
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.