Literature DB >> 26271622

Risks to the fetus from diagnostic imaging during pregnancy: review and proposal of a clinical protocol.

Mafalda Gomes1, Alexandra Matias2, Filipe Macedo3.   

Abstract

Every day, medical practitioners face the dilemma of exposing pregnant or possibly pregnant patients to radiation from diagnostic examinations. Both doctors and patients often have questions about the risks of radiation. The most vulnerable period is between the 8th and 15th weeks of gestation. Deterministic effects like pregnancy loss, congenital malformations, growth retardation and neurobehavioral abnormalities have threshold doses above 100-200 mGy. The risk is considered negligible at 50 mGy and in reality no diagnostic examination exceeds this limit. The risk of carcinogenesis is slightly higher than in the general population. Intravenous iodinated contrast is discouraged, except in highly selected patients. Considering all the possible noxious effects of radiation exposure, measures to diminish radiation are essential and affect the fetal outcome. Nonionizing procedures should be considered whenever possible and every radiology center should have its own data analysis on fetal radiation exposure. In this review, we analyze existing literature on fetal risks due to radiation exposure, producing a clinical protocol to guide safe radiation use in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic imaging; Fetal risks; Fetus; Pregnancy; Radiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26271622     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3403-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  99 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in fetal evaluation.

Authors:  D Levine
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02

2.  Quality initiatives: guidelines for use of medical imaging during pregnancy and lactation.

Authors:  Emilie Tremblay; Eric Thérasse; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Isabelle Trop
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Fetal radiation dose during gestation estimated on an anthropomorphic phantom for three generations of CT scanners.

Authors:  Anthony G Gilet; Jared M Dunkin; Thomas J Fernandez; Terry M Button; Nancy E Budorick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Exposure to diagnostic radiological procedures and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Helen D Bailey; Bruce K Armstrong; Nicholas H de Klerk; Lin Fritschi; John Attia; Liane Lockwood; Elizabeth Milne
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Ionizing radiations in pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review of literature.

Authors:  M De Santis; E Di Gianantonio; G Straface; A F Cavaliere; A Caruso; F Schiavon; R Berletti; M Clementi
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study.

Authors:  S K Doshi; I S Negus; J M Oduko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Pregnancy screening of adolescents and women before radiologic testing: does radiology need a national guideline?

Authors:  Kimberly Applegate
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 8.  Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of diagnostic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy.

Authors:  Robert L Brent
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Therapeutic ERCP and pregnancy: is the radiation risk for the conceptus trivial?

Authors:  Eleni T Samara; John Stratakis; Jean M Enele Melono; Ioannis A Mouzas; Konstantinos Perisinakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Abdominopelvic MR imaging in the nonobstetric evaluation of pregnant patients.

Authors:  R Forstner; C L Kalbhen; R A Filly; H Hricak
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  MRI in pregnant patients with suspected abdominal and pelvic cancer: a practical guide for radiologists.

Authors:  Benedetta Gui; Francesco Cambi; Maura Micco; Martina Sbarra; Federica Petta; Rosa Autorino; Rosa De Vincenzo; Vincenzo Valentini; Giovanni Scambia; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Effect of radiologist pregnancy on the performance of pediatric fluoroscopic studies: a survey of Society for Pediatric Radiology members.

Authors:  Jane S Kim; Jennifer K Son; Erica Poletto; Andrew S Phelps; Terry L Levin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-06-01

3.  Fluoroscopic practice patterns in pediatric radiology during pregnancy.

Authors:  Einat Blumfield
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-06-01

4.  SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Raymond R Price; Allison E Tonkin; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Radiological staging in pregnant patients with cancer.

Authors:  Ramona Woitek; Daniela Prayer; Azadeh Hojreh; Thomas Helbich
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-02-08

Review 6.  Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Alexander Vaiserman; Alexander Koliada; Oksana Zabuga; Yehoshua Socol
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Radiation exposure in pregnancy: outcomes, perceptions and teratological counseling in Turkish women.

Authors:  Mehmet Seven; Aysel Kalayci Yigin; Deniz Agirbasli; Mustafa Tarik Alay; Faruk Kirbiyik; Mustafa Demir
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 1.707

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.