Literature DB >> 27645287

Radiation doses for pregnant women in the late pregnancy undergoing fetal-computed tomography: a comparison of dosimetry and Monte Carlo simulations.

Yuta Matsunaga1,2, Ai Kawaguchi3,4, Masanao Kobayashi5, Shigetaka Suzuki6, Shoichi Suzuki5, Koichi Chida3.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were (1) to compare the radiation doses for 320- and 80-row fetal-computed tomography (CT), estimated using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and the ImPACT Calculator (hereinafter referred to as the "CT dosimetry software"), for a woman in her late pregnancy and her fetus and (2) to estimate the overlapped fetal radiation dose from a 320-row CT examination using two different estimation methods of the CT dosimetry software. The direct TLD data in the present study were obtained from a previous study. The exposure parameters used for TLD measurements were entered into the CT dosimetry software, and the appropriate radiation dose for the pregnant woman and her fetus was estimated. When the whole organs (e.g., the colon, small intestine, and ovaries) and the fetus were included in the scan range, the difference in the estimated doses between the TLD measurement and the CT dosimetry software measurement was <1 mGy (<23 %) in both CT units. In addition, when the whole organs were within the scan range, the CT dosimetry software was used for evaluating the fetal radiation dose and organ-specific doses for the woman in the late pregnancy. The conventional method using the CT dosimetry software cannot take into account the overlap between volumetric sections. Therefore, the conventional method using a 320-row CT unit in a wide-volume mode might result in the underestimation of radiation doses for the fetus and the colon, small intestine, and ovaries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Fetus; Patient exposure; Pregnant woman; Volumetric-computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27645287     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-016-0377-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  19 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis of hypochondrogenesis using fetal MRI: a case report.

Authors:  Hiroshi Suzumura; Tatsuo Kohno; Gen Nishimura; Hiroshi Watanabe; Osamu Arisaka
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-09

2.  Relationship between specific organ doses and volumetric CT dose indices in multidetector CT studies.

Authors:  Kosuke Matsubara; Kichiro Koshida; Kimiya Noto; Tetsunori Shimono; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Osamu Matsui
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.735

3.  Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study.

Authors:  S K Doshi; I S Negus; J M Oduko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Effect of tube current modulation for dose estimation using a simulation tool on body CT examination.

Authors:  Ai Kawaguchi; Yuta Matsunaga; Masanao Kobayashi; Shoichi Suzuki; Kosuke Matsubara; Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Low-dose fetal CT for evaluation of severe congenital skeletal anomalies: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Teresa Victoria; Monica Epelman; Michael Bebbington; Ann M Johnson; Sandra Kramer; R Douglas Wilson; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-06

6.  Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation.

Authors:  Lynne M Hurwitz; Terry Yoshizumi; Robert E Reiman; Philip C Goodman; Erik K Paulson; Donald P Frush; Greta Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; Lottie Barnes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size.

Authors:  Erin Angel; Clinton V Wellnitz; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Nazanin Yaghmai; John J DeMarco; Christopher H Cagnon; James W Sayre; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias by combining two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound and intrauterine three-dimensional helical computer tomography.

Authors:  R Ruano; M Molho; J Roume; Y Ville
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Nationwide radiation dose survey of computed tomography for fetal skeletal dysplasias.

Authors:  Osamu Miyazaki; Hideaki Sawai; Jun Murotsuki; Gen Nishimura; Tetsuya Horiuchi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-04-16

10.  Evaluation of organ doses and effective dose according to the ICRP Publication 110 reference male/female phantom and the modified ImPACT CT patient dosimetry.

Authors:  Masanao Kobayashi; Yasuki Asada; Kosuke Matsubara; Yuta Matsunaga; Ai Kawaguchi; Kazuhiro Katada; Hiroshi Toyama; Kichiro Koshida; Shouichi Suzuki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Real-time ultrasound-MRI fusion image virtual navigation for locating intraspinal tumour in a pregnant woman.

Authors:  Tian-Jian Liu; Fang Shen; Chao Zhang; Pin-Tong Huang; Yong-Jian Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Fetal dose conversion factor for fetal computed tomography examinations: A mathematical phantom study.

Authors:  Yuta Matsunaga; Ai Kawaguchi; Masanao Kobayashi; Shoichi Suzuki; Yasuki Asada; Kiyoshi Ito; Koichi Chida
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Fetal radiation dose of four tube voltages in abdominal CT examinations during pregnancy: A phantom study.

Authors:  Yuta Matsunaga; Tomonobu Haba; Masanao Kobayashi; Shoichi Suzuki; Yasuki Asada; Koichi Chida
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.