Literature DB >> 16498094

Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis.

Stefania Rizzo1, Mannudeep Kalra, Bernhard Schmidt, Tejas Dalal, Christoph Suess, Thomas Flohr, Michael Blake, Sanjay Saini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare image quality and radiation dose associated with abdominopelvic CT using combined modulation, angular modulation, and constant tube current.
CONCLUSION: Compared with using a constant tube current to scan the abdomen and pelvis, the use of a combined modulation technique results in a substantial reduction (42-44%) in radiation dose with acceptable image noise and diagnostic acceptability.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16498094     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  41 in total

1.  Current status of low dose multi-detector CT in the urinary tract.

Authors:  Mi Kim Sung; Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-28

2.  Automatic tube current modulation technique for multidetector CT: is it effective with a 64-detector CT?

Authors:  Yoshinori Funama; Kazuo Awai; Masahiro Hatemura; Masamitchi Shimamura; Yumi Yanaga; Seitaro Oda; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-11-01

3.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Bernhard Krauss; Martin Sedlmair; Michael Grasruck; Herbert Bruder; Dominik Morhard; Christian Fink; Sabine Weckbach; Miriam Lenhard; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland.

Authors:  S J Foley; M F McEntee; L A Rainford
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Radiation dose in CT colonography--trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols.

Authors:  M H Liedenbaum; H W Venema; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Automatic exposure control in CT: the effect of patient size, anatomical region and prescribed modulation strength on tube current and image quality.

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Kostas Perisinakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Optimizing CT technique to reduce radiation dose: effect of changes in kVp, iterative reconstruction, and noise index on dose and noise in a human cadaver.

Authors:  Kevin J Chang; Scott Collins; Baojun Li; William W Mayo-Smith
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-10-03

9.  Fetal doses to pregnant patients from CT with tube current modulation calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and realistic phantoms.

Authors:  Jianwei Gu; X George Xu; Peter F Caracappa; Bob Liu
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Ambarish Gopal; Song S Mao; Daniel Karlsberg; Emily Young; Joshua Waggoner; Naser Ahmadi; Raveen S Pal; John Leal; Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.