Literature DB >> 28887589

Assessment of CT dose to the fetus and pregnant female patient using patient-specific computational models.

Tianwu Xie1, Pierre-Alexandre Poletti1, Alexandra Platon1, Christoph D Becker1, Habib Zaidi2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This work provides detailed estimates of the foetal dose from diagnostic CT imaging of pregnant patients to enable the assessment of the diagnostic benefits considering the associated radiation risks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To produce realistic biological and physical representations of pregnant patients and the embedded foetus, we developed a methodology for construction of patient-specific voxel-based computational phantoms based on existing standardised hybrid computational pregnant female phantoms. We estimated the maternal absorbed dose and foetal organ dose for 30 pregnant patients referred to the emergency unit of Geneva University Hospital for abdominal CT scans.
RESULTS: The effective dose to the mother varied from 1.1 mSv to 2.0 mSv with an average of 1.6 mSv, while commercial dose-tracking software reported an average effective dose of 1.9 mSv (range 1.7-2.3 mSv). The foetal dose normalised to CTDIvol varies between 0.85 and 1.63 with an average of 1.17.
CONCLUSION: The methodology for construction of personalised computational models can be exploited to estimate the patient-specific radiation dose from CT imaging procedures. Likewise, the dosimetric data can be used for assessment of the radiation risks to pregnant patients and the foetus from various CT scanning protocols, thus guiding the decision-making process. KEY POINTS: • In CT examinations, the absorbed dose is non-uniformly distributed within foetal organs. • This work reports, for the first time, estimates of foetal organ-level dose. • The foetal brain and skeleton doses present significant correlation with gestational age. • The conceptus dose normalised to CTDI vol varies between 0.85 and 1.63. • The developed methodology is adequate for patient-specific CT radiation dosimetry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Foetal dose; Monte Carlo simulation; Pregnant female models; Radiation dosimetry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887589     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5000-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  Fetal radiation dose during gestation estimated on an anthropomorphic phantom for three generations of CT scanners.

Authors:  Anthony G Gilet; Jared M Dunkin; Thomas J Fernandez; Terry M Button; Nancy E Budorick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Estimated fetal radiation dose from multislice CT studies.

Authors:  J P Felmlee; J E Gray; M L Leetzow; J C Price
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Early first-trimester fetal radiation dose estimation in 16-MDCT without and with automated tube current modulation.

Authors:  Tracy A Jaffe; Terry T Yoshizumi; Greta I Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; Lynne M Hurwitz; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Comparing different methods for estimating radiation dose to the conceptus.

Authors:  X Lopez-Rendon; M S Walgraeve; S Woussen; A Dedulle; G Zhang; H Bosmans; F Zanca
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Fetal radiation dose in computed tomography.

Authors:  Anna Kelaranta; Touko Kaasalainen; Raija Seuri; Paula Toroi; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Abdominal CT during pregnancy: a phantom study on the effect of patient centring on conceptus radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  G Solomou; A E Papadakis; J Damilakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Fetal Radiation Dose from 18F-FDG in Pregnant Patients Imaged with PET, PET/CT, and PET/MR.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Richard Laforest; Jerold W Wallis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients--1997-2006.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lazarus; Carolynn Debenedectis; David North; Patricia K Spencer; William W Mayo-Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Development of a 9-months pregnant hybrid phantom and its internal dosimetry for thyroid agents.

Authors:  E Hoseinian-Azghadi; L Rafat-Motavalli; H Miri-Hakimabad
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 2.724

View more
  4 in total

1.  Estimation of the radiation dose in pregnancy: an automated patient-specific model using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Tianwu Xie; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Suspicion of appendicitis in pregnant women: emergency evaluation by sonography and low-dose CT with oral contrast.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Diomidis Botsikas; Minerva Becker; Marlise Picarra; Olivier T Rutschmann; Nicolas C Buchs; Habib Zaidi; Alexandra Platon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; William P Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Paul E Kinahan; Nick Bottenus; Alejandro F Frangi; Andrew Maidment; Joseph Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-11

4.  Case series of 20 pregnant women with 2019 novel coronavirus disease in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Yuping Guo; Jingping Yuan; Ming Wang; Ying Yu; Junmei Bian; Cuifang Fan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 1.697

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.