Literature DB >> 1541316

Differential cardiovascular effects of propranolol, atenolol, and pindolol measured by impedance cardiography.

S H Thomas1, R C Cooper, M Ekwuru, S Fletcher, J Gilbody, T S Husseyin, M Ishaque, R Jagathesan, G Reddy, S E Smith.   

Abstract

We have evaluated Sramek's method of impedance cardiography as a non-invasive way of detecting the cardiovascular effects of drugs. We made cardiovascular measurements using the method during passive tilting and exercise 2 h after the oral administration of atenolol (50 and 100 mg), propranolol (40 and 80 mg), pindolol (5 and 10 mg), and placebo in seven separate studies involving eight healthy male volunteers. Equivalent doses of the pure antagonists atenolol (beta 1) and propranolol (beta 1, beta 2) produced similar reductions in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and cardiac index, and increases in stroke volume and total peripheral resistance, particularly during exercise. In contrast the partial agonist pindolol produced increases in heart rate and cardiac index, and reductions in peripheral resistance at rest. During passive tilting and exercise pindolol reduced heart rate, but cardiac output and total peripheral resistance were unchanged except at the highest levels of exercise. The similar cardiovascular effects of atenolol and propranolol, but differing effects of pindolol, are consistent with reports using other methods of measurement. This suggests that impedance cardiography may have a place in the non-invasive assessment of the cardiovascular effects of drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1541316     DOI: 10.1007/bf00314919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  41 in total

1.  Problems in assessing beta-adrenoceptor antagonism in man.

Authors:  C F George
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.

Authors:  D B Northridge; I N Findlay; J Wilson; E Henderson; H J Dargie
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-02

3.  Clinical evaluation of impedance cardiography.

Authors:  D S Goldstein; R O Cannon; R Zimlichman; H R Keiser
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1986-06

4.  Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  K D Donovan; G J Dobb; W P Woods; B E Hockings
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Effects of cardioselective and nonselective beta-blockade on dynamic exercise performance in mildly hypertensive men.

Authors:  F H Leenen; C H Coenen; M Zonderland; A H Maas
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Bioelectric impedance. New developments and clinical application.

Authors:  J M Van de Water; P A Philips; L G Thouin; L S Watanabe; R S Lappen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1971-06

7.  Comparison of bioimpedance and thermodilution methods for determining cardiac output: experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  F G Spinale; H D Reines; F A Crawford
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Hemodynamic effects of nicorandil, isosorbide dinitrate, and dihydralazine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  G G Belz; J H Matthews; A Beck; G Wagner; B Schneider
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.105

9.  Dynamic responses to intravenous urapidil and dihydralazine in normal subjects.

Authors:  G G Belz; J H Matthews; D Graf; H C Stern; R Bachmann; G Belz; V W Steinijans; D Palm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Continuous noninvasive real-time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance.

Authors:  D P Bernstein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  2 in total

1.  Lack of pharmacodynamic interactions between acute dose flosequinan and xamoterol. A pilot study in healthy subjects.

Authors:  H W Ng; T J Walley; Y Tsao; A M Breckenridge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Does impedance cardiography reliably estimate left ventricular ejection fraction?

Authors:  N J van der Meer; M W Oomen; A Vonk Noordegraaf; R J Pijpers; M A Plaizier; P M de Vries
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.