Literature DB >> 1385972

Agreement and reproducibility of the estimates of cardiovascular function by impedance cardiography and M-mode echocardiography in healthy subjects.

C de Mey1, J Matthews, R Butzer, V Schroeter, G G Belz.   

Abstract

The reproducibility and agreement of the estimates of stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) by transthoracic impedance cardiography (ZCG) and M-mode echocardiography (ECHO) were analyzed before and after the placebo-controlled administration of ascending doses of isosorbide dinitrate and nicorandil in 12 healthy subjects. There was no biostatistical agreement between the two methods in estimating cardiovascular function either before or after dosing (ZCG estimated substantially larger SV, CO and lower TPR). But, ZCG and ECHO estimated about similar overall treatment related changes (across treatments and periods) and reached substantially better agreement when the values were expressed as ratio of the baseline before dosing. Such improvement did not occur when the data were expressed as arithmetic difference from baseline. In spite of the improvement of agreement by expressing the data as ratio of baseline, the coefficients of reproducibility between the two methods (circa 25% of baseline) remained too large to judge the methods interchangeable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1385972      PMCID: PMC1381383          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb04115.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  17 in total

1.  Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy.

Authors:  L E Teichholz; T Kreulen; M V Herman; R Gorlin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.

Authors:  B Silke
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-11

3.  Comparison and reproducibility of transthoracic bioimpedance and dual beam Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac function in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H W Ng; T Walley; Y Tsao; A M Breckenridge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.

Authors:  D B Northridge; I N Findlay; J Wilson; E Henderson; H J Dargie
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-02

5.  Methods for assessing whether change depends on initial value.

Authors:  R J Hayes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Postprandial haemodynamic changes: a source of bias in cardiovascular research affected by its own methodological bias.

Authors:  C de Mey; S Hansen-Schmidt; D Enterling
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Assessment of the hemodynamic response to single passive head up tilt by non-invasive methods in normotensive subjects.

Authors:  C de Mey; D Enterling
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-07

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Noninvasive assessment of cardiac performance by impedance cardiography: disagreement between two equations to estimate stroke volume.

Authors:  C de Mey; D Enterling
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1988-01

10.  Controlled comparison of the pharmacodynamic effects of nicorandil (SG-75) and isosorbide dinitrate in man.

Authors:  G G Belz; J Matthews; J Heinrich; G Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output in 1998.

Authors:  M Singer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Method specificity of non-invasive blood pressure measurement: oscillometry and finger pulse pressure vs acoustic methods.

Authors:  C De Mey; V Schroeter; R Butzer; S Roll; G G Belz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Method specificity of the auscultatory estimates of the inodilatory reduction of diastolic blood pressure based on Korotkoff IV and V criteria.

Authors:  C De Mey
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Disagreement between standard transthoracic impedance cardiography and the automated transthoracic electrical bioimpedance method in estimating the cardiovascular responses to phenylephrine and isoprenaline in healthy man.

Authors:  C De Mey; D Enterling
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Effect of pretreatment with the selective beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist bisoprolol on the subsequent cardiovascular actions and beta-adrenoceptor subtype specific occupancy of celiprolol in healthy man.

Authors:  C de Mey; K Beithaupt; D Palm; U Fuhr; G G Belz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.