Literature DB >> 1795498

Value of a modified continuity equation method to quantify mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm.

W Voelker1, B Regele, H Dittmann, M Schmid, M Mauser, V Kühlkamp, K R Karsch.   

Abstract

To quantify valve area in mitral stenosis, a modified continuity equation method using continuous wave Doppler and thermodilution measurements was applied. In 14 patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm (age: 49 +/- 11 years), transmitral flow velocity was recorded by continuous wave Doppler during right and left heart catheterization. Mitral valve area was calculated by three different methods: 1. According to the continuity equation, stroke volume (thermodilution technique) was divided by the registered time velocity integral of the mitral stenotic jet (continuous wave Doppler). 2. Mitral valve area was calculated by the pressure half-time method. 3. Simultaneous pulmonary capillary wedge and left ventricular pressure measurements were used for determination of mitral valve area according to the Gorlin formula. The mitral valve area determined by application of the continuity equation (y) showed a close correlation to the valve area calculated by the Gorlin equation (x): y = 0.73x + 0.12, SEE = 0.11 cm2, r = 0.88, P less than 0.001. In contrast, the correlation between mitral valve area determined by pressure half-time (y) and the Gorlin formula (x) was not as good: y = 0.77x + 0.11, SEE = 0.26 cm2, r = 0.65, P less than 0.05. Thus, the continuity equation method using combined continuous wave Doppler and thermodilution technique allows a valid determination of mitral valve area. In patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm, this technique is superior to the noninvasive determination of mitral valve area by the conventional pressure half-time method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1795498     DOI: 10.1007/BF01798541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0023-2173


  15 in total

1.  Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods.

Authors:  S Nakatani; T Masuyama; K Kodama; A Kitabatake; K Fujii; T Kamada
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.

Authors:  D B Northridge; I N Findlay; J Wilson; E Henderson; H J Dargie
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-02

3.  Inaccuracy of mitral pressure half-time immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy. Dependence on transmitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance.

Authors:  J D Thomas; G T Wilkins; C Y Choong; V M Abascal; I F Palacios; P C Block; A E Weyman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Validation of continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements of mitral and tricuspid prosthetic valve gradients: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter study.

Authors:  G T Wilkins; L D Gillam; G L Kritzer; R A Levine; I F Palacios; A E Weyman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Doppler mitral pressure half-time: a clinical tool in search of theoretical justification.

Authors:  J D Thomas; A E Weyman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Advances in the hemodynamic assessment of stenotic cardiac valves.

Authors:  B A Carabello
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Measurement of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  D J Robson; M Rodman; J C Flaxman; F A Mayhew
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Comparison of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography and intracardiac hemodynamics for quantification of mitral stenosis.

Authors:  M A Gonzalez; J S Child; J Krivokapich
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the valve area in patients with atrioventricular valve stenosis by application of the continuity equation.

Authors:  K Karp; D Teien; P Eriksson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  [Doppler echocardiography determination of the pressure gradient and valve orifice area in mitral valve stenosis].

Authors:  F Kraus; K Dennig; P Bosiljanoff; W Rudolph
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.