Literature DB >> 23090057

Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Paul M Briley1, Pádraig T Kitterick, A Quentin Summerfield.   

Abstract

Research with barn owls suggested that sound source location is represented topographically in the brain by an array of neurons each tuned to a narrow range of locations. However, research with small-headed mammals has offered an alternative view in which location is represented by the balance of activity in two opponent channels broadly tuned to the left and right auditory space. Both channels may be present in each auditory cortex, although the channel representing contralateral space may be dominant. Recent studies have suggested that opponent channel coding of space may also apply in humans, although these studies have used a restricted set of spatial cues or probed a restricted set of spatial locations, and there have been contradictory reports as to the relative dominance of the ipsilateral and contralateral channels in each cortex. The current study used electroencephalography (EEG) in conjunction with sound field stimulus presentation to address these issues and to inform the development of an explicit computational model of human sound source localization. Neural responses were compatible with the opponent channel account of sound source localization and with contralateral channel dominance in the left, but not the right, auditory cortex. A computational opponent channel model reproduced every important aspect of the EEG data and allowed inferences about the width of tuning in the spatial channels. Moreover, the model predicted the oft-reported decrease in spatial acuity measured psychophysically with increasing reference azimuth. Predictions of spatial acuity closely matched those measured psychophysically by previous authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23090057      PMCID: PMC3540274          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0356-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  54 in total

1.  Correlation between the activity of single auditory cortical neurons and sound-localization behavior in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  G H Recanzone; D C Guard; M L Phan; T K Su
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  W A Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard; B Röder; H J Neville
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-10-25

Review 3.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.

Authors:  Blake W Johnson; Michael J Hautus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Auditory agnosia and auditory spatial deficits following left hemispheric lesions: evidence for distinct processing pathways.

Authors:  S Clarke; A Bellmann; R A Meuli; G Assal; A J Steck
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The AB-York crescent of sound: an apparatus for assessing spatial-listening skills in children and adults.

Authors:  P T Kitterick; R E S Lovett; A M Goman; A Q Summerfield
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-08

7.  Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  David A Magezi; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Asymmetrical representation of auditory space in human cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Hannu Tiitinen; Ismo Miettinen; Paavo Alku; Patrick J C May
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Evidence for pitch chroma mapping in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Charlotte Breakey; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Patrick J C May; Paavo Alku; Hannu Tiitinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reduced temporal processing in older, normal-hearing listeners evident from electrophysiological responses to shifts in interaural time difference.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann C Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Tuning to Binaural Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Nathan C Higgins; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

5.  Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Susan A McLaughlin; Teemu Rinne; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Where did that noise come from? Memory for sound locations is exceedingly eccentric both in front and in rear space.

Authors:  Franco Delogu; Phillip McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-06-13

7.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

Authors:  Won So; Spencer B Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Active Sound Localization Sharpens Spatial Tuning in Human Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Kiki van der Heijden; Josef P Rauschecker; Elia Formisano; Giancarlo Valente; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.