Literature DB >> 20702739

Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

David A Magezi1, Katrin Krumbholz.   

Abstract

In humans, horizontal sound localization of low-frequency sounds is mainly based on interaural time differences (ITDs). Traditionally, it was assumed that ITDs are converted into a topographic (or rate-place) code, supported by an array of neurons with parametric tuning to ITDs within the behaviorally relevant range. Although this topographic model has been confirmed in owls, its applicability to mammals has been challenged by recent physiological results suggesting that, at least in small-headed species, ITDs are represented by a nontopographic population rate code, which involves only two opponent (left and right) channels, broadly tuned to ITDs from the two auditory hemifields. The current study investigates which of these two models of ITD processing is more likely to apply to humans. For that, evoked responses to abrupt changes in the ITDs of otherwise continuous sounds were measured with electroencephalography. The ITD change was either away from ("outward" change) or toward the midline ("inward" change). According to the opponent-channel model, the response to an outward ITD change should be larger than the response to the corresponding inward change, whereas the topographic model would predict similar response sizes for both conditions. The measured response sizes were highly consistent with the predictions of the opponent-channel model and contravened the predictions of the topographic model, suggesting that, in humans, ITDs are coded nontopographically. The hemispheric distributions of the ITD change responses suggest that the majority of ITD-sensitive neurons in each hemisphere are tuned to ITDs from the contralateral hemifield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20702739      PMCID: PMC2957465          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00424.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  80 in total

1.  Effects of stimulus parameters on human evoked potentials to shifts in the lateralization of a noise.

Authors:  L K McEvoy; T W Picton; S C Champagne
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1991

2.  Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  M Scherg; D Von Cramon
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-09

3.  Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contralateral inhibition. I. Simulation of lateralization for stationary signals.

Authors:  W Lindemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interaural correlation discrimination: II. Relation to binaural unmasking.

Authors:  N I Durlach; K J Gabriel; H S Colburn; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Role of cat primary auditory cortex for sound-localization behavior.

Authors:  W M Jenkins; M M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Lateralization of low-frequency transients.

Authors:  G B Henning
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. III. Joint dependence on interaural time and amplitude differences in discrimination and detection.

Authors:  H S Colburn; J S Latimer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of carrier and modulation frequency on lateralization based on interaural phase and interaural group delay.

Authors:  G B Henning; J Ashton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Responses of single neurons in physiologically defined area AI of cat cerebral cortex: sensitivity to interaural intensity differences.

Authors:  D P Phillips; D R Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  36 in total

1.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Widespread and Opponent fMRI Signals Represent Sound Location in Macaque Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Michael Ortiz-Rios; Frederico A C Azevedo; Paweł Kuśmierek; Dávid Z Balla; Matthias H Munk; Georgios A Keliris; Nikos K Logothetis; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The neural representation of interaural time differences in gerbils is transformed from midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Lucile A C Belliveau; Dmitry R Lyamzin; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans.

Authors:  Mikaella Sarrou; Pia Marlena Schmitz; Nicole Hamm; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory spatial attention representations in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Lingqiang Kong; Samantha W Michalka; Maya L Rosen; Summer L Sheremata; Jascha D Swisher; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; David C Somers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Kristina Schmiedchen; Ines Nitsche; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Pádraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.