Literature DB >> 10556600

Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials.

W A Teder-Sälejärvi1, S A Hillyard, B Röder, H J Neville.   

Abstract

Young adult subjects attended selectively to brief noise bursts delivered in free-field via central and peripheral arrays of four loudspeakers each that were arranged along a semi-circle extending from the midline to 90 degrees right of center. Frequent "standard" stimuli (90%) and infrequent "target/deviant" stimuli (10%) of increased bandwidth were delivered at a fast rate in random order and equiprobably from all eight speakers. In separate runs, the subject's task was to selectively attend to the center or rightmost speaker, and to press a button to the infrequent "target" stimuli occurring at the designated (spatial) location. Behavioral detection rates and concurrently recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) indicated that auditory attention was deployed as a finely tuned gradient around the attended source. The attentional gradients were steeper for the central than the peripheral array, indicating that attention can be more sharply focused upon sound sources directly in front of the listener. The ERP data suggested that selection for location is accomplished in two distinct stages, with an initial broadly tuned filtering, followed by a more narrowly focused selection of attended-location deviants.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10556600     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00023-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  28 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporally selective attention supports speech processing in 3- to 5-year-old children.

Authors:  Lori B Astheimer; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  Effects of the azimuthal position of stationary and moving sound images on the mismatch negativity phenomenon.

Authors:  L B Shestopalova; S F Vaitulevich
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

4.  The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Kenneth C Roberts; Roy E Crist; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Attending points in time and space.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange; Ulrike M Krämer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Differential modulation of auditory responses to attended and unattended speech in different listening conditions.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Nai Ding
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Proprioceptive cues modulate further processing of spatially congruent auditory information. a high-density EEG study.

Authors:  S L Simon-Dack; W A Teder-Sälejärvi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Pádraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-23

10.  A new auditory multi-class brain-computer interface paradigm: spatial hearing as an informative cue.

Authors:  Martijn Schreuder; Benjamin Blankertz; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.