Literature DB >> 30126968

Active Sound Localization Sharpens Spatial Tuning in Human Primary Auditory Cortex.

Kiki van der Heijden1, Josef P Rauschecker2, Elia Formisano1,3, Giancarlo Valente1, Beatrice de Gelder4,5.   

Abstract

Spatial hearing sensitivity in humans is dynamic and task-dependent, but the mechanisms in human auditory cortex that enable dynamic sound location encoding remain unclear. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we assessed how active behavior affects encoding of sound location (azimuth) in primary auditory cortical areas and planum temporale (PT). According to the hierarchical model of auditory processing and cortical functional specialization, PT is implicated in sound location ("where") processing. Yet, our results show that spatial tuning profiles in primary auditory cortical areas (left primary core and right caudo-medial belt) sharpened during a sound localization ("where") task compared with a sound identification ("what") task. In contrast, spatial tuning in PT was sharp but did not vary with task performance. We further applied a population pattern decoder to the measured fMRI activity patterns, which confirmed the task-dependent effects in the left core: sound location estimates from fMRI patterns measured during active sound localization were most accurate. In PT, decoding accuracy was not modulated by task performance. These results indicate that changes of population activity in human primary auditory areas reflect dynamic and task-dependent processing of sound location. As such, our findings suggest that the hierarchical model of auditory processing may need to be revised to include an interaction between primary and functionally specialized areas depending on behavioral requirements.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT According to a purely hierarchical view, cortical auditory processing consists of a series of analysis stages from sensory (acoustic) processing in primary auditory cortex to specialized processing in higher-order areas. Posterior-dorsal cortical auditory areas, planum temporale (PT) in humans, are considered to be functionally specialized for spatial processing. However, this model is based mostly on passive listening studies. Our results provide compelling evidence that active behavior (sound localization) sharpens spatial selectivity in primary auditory cortex, whereas spatial tuning in functionally specialized areas (PT) is narrow but task-invariant. These findings suggest that the hierarchical view of cortical functional specialization needs to be extended: our data indicate that active behavior involves feedback projections from higher-order regions to primary auditory cortex.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/388574-14$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical functional specialization; fMRI; human auditory cortex; sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126968      PMCID: PMC6170980          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0587-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  54 in total

Review 1.  Integrated model of visual processing.

Authors:  J Bullier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-10

2.  Spatial deployment of attention within and across hemifields in an auditory task.

Authors:  C Rorden; J Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis.

Authors:  Rainer Goebel; Fabrizio Esposito; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Processing of natural sounds in human auditory cortex: tonotopy, spectral tuning, and relation to voice sensitivity.

Authors:  Michelle Moerel; Federico De Martino; Elia Formisano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex.

Authors:  B Tian; D Reser; A Durham; A Kustov; J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Susan A McLaughlin; Teemu Rinne; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.

Authors:  T A Mondor; R J Zatorre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Decoding sound source location and separation using neural population activity patterns.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Engaging in an auditory task suppresses responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gonzalo H Otazu; Lung-Hao Tai; Yang Yang; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Opponent Coding of Sound Location (Azimuth) in Planum Temporale is Robust to Sound-Level Variations.

Authors:  Kiki Derey; Giancarlo Valente; Beatrice de Gelder; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  5 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Adrian Y Cho; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.

Authors:  Kiki van der Heijden; Josef P Rauschecker; Beatrice de Gelder; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Evaluating hearing performance with cochlear implants within the same patient using daily randomization and imaging-based fitting - The ELEPHANT study.

Authors:  L J G Lambriks; M van Hoof; J A Debruyne; M Janssen; J Chalupper; K A van der Heijden; J R Hof; C A Hellingman; E L J George; E M J Devocht
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Movement and VIP Interneuron Activation Differentially Modulate Encoding in Mouse Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  James Bigelow; Ryan J Morrill; Jefferson Dekloe; Andrea R Hasenstaub
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-09-18

5.  Cerebral Representation of Sound Localization Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xuexin Tian; Yimeng Liu; Zengzhi Guo; Jieqing Cai; Jie Tang; Fei Chen; Hongzheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.