Literature DB >> 28827357

Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Nathan C Higgins1, Susan A McLaughlin2, Teemu Rinne3,4, G Christopher Stecker5.   

Abstract

Few auditory functions are as important or as universal as the capacity for auditory spatial awareness (e.g., sound localization). That ability relies on sensitivity to acoustical cues-particularly interaural time and level differences (ITD and ILD)-that correlate with sound-source locations. Under nonspatial listening conditions, cortical sensitivity to ITD and ILD takes the form of broad contralaterally dominated response functions. It is unknown, however, whether that sensitivity reflects representations of the specific physical cues or a higher-order representation of auditory space (i.e., integrated cue processing), nor is it known whether responses to spatial cues are modulated by active spatial listening. To investigate, sensitivity to parametrically varied ITD or ILD cues was measured using fMRI during spatial and nonspatial listening tasks. Task type varied across blocks where targets were presented in one of three dimensions: auditory location, pitch, or visual brightness. Task effects were localized primarily to lateral posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) and modulated binaural-cue response functions differently in the two hemispheres. Active spatial listening (location tasks) enhanced both contralateral and ipsilateral responses in the right hemisphere but maintained or enhanced contralateral dominance in the left hemisphere. Two observations suggest integrated processing of ITD and ILD. First, overlapping regions in medial pSTG exhibited significant sensitivity to both cues. Second, successful classification of multivoxel patterns was observed for both cue types and-critically-for cross-cue classification. Together, these results suggest a higher-order representation of auditory space in the human auditory cortex that at least partly integrates the specific underlying cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory space; binaural cues; fMRI; human auditory cortex; sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28827357      PMCID: PMC5594681          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707522114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  77 in total

1.  Specialization of binaural responses in ventral auditory cortices.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Douglas A Storace; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Systematic representation of sound locations in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tyler Davis; Karen F LaRocque; Jeanette A Mumford; Kenneth A Norman; Anthony D Wagner; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Binaural processing of sound pressure level in cat primary auditory cortex: evidence for a representation based on absolute levels rather than interaural level differences.

Authors:  M N Semple; L M Kitzes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Responses of single neurons in physiologically defined area AI of cat cerebral cortex: sensitivity to interaural intensity differences.

Authors:  D P Phillips; D R Irvine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Tuning in to sound: frequency-selective attentional filter in human primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sandra Da Costa; Wietske van der Zwaag; Lee M Miller; Stephanie Clarke; Melissa Saenz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Brain activations during bimodal dual tasks depend on the nature and combination of component tasks.

Authors:  Emma Salo; Teemu Rinne; Oili Salonen; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Attention Modulates the Auditory Cortical Processing of Spatial and Category Cues in Naturalistic Auditory Scenes.

Authors:  Hanna Renvall; Noël Staeren; Claudia S Barz; Anke Ley; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Opponent Coding of Sound Location (Azimuth) in Planum Temporale is Robust to Sound-Level Variations.

Authors:  Kiki Derey; Giancarlo Valente; Beatrice de Gelder; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  12 in total

1.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Binaural spatial adaptation as a mechanism for asymmetric trading of interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Travis M Moore; Erin M Picou; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Frederick J Gallun; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Representation of Auditory Motion Directions and Sound Source Locations in the Human Planum Temporale.

Authors:  Ceren Battal; Mohamed Rezk; Stefania Mattioni; Jyothirmayi Vadlamudi; Olivier Collignon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Active Sound Localization Sharpens Spatial Tuning in Human Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Kiki van der Heijden; Josef P Rauschecker; Elia Formisano; Giancarlo Valente; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.

Authors:  Kiki van der Heijden; Josef P Rauschecker; Beatrice de Gelder; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Large group differences in binaural sensitivity are represented in preattentive responses from auditory cortex.

Authors:  Angkana Lertpoompunya; Erol J Ozmeral; Nathan C Higgins; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Local and Global Spatial Organization of Interaural Level Difference and Frequency Preferences in Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Mariangela Panniello; Andrew J King; Johannes C Dahmen; Kerry M M Walker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Neurons in primary auditory cortex represent sound source location in a cue-invariant manner.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Stephen M Town; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Cortical auditory distance representation based on direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Keerthi Kumar Doreswamy; Samantha Huang; Stephanie Rossi; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.