Literature DB >> 31197624

Where did that noise come from? Memory for sound locations is exceedingly eccentric both in front and in rear space.

Franco Delogu1, Phillip McMurray2.   

Abstract

Few studies have examined the stability of the representation of the position of sound sources in spatial working memory. The goal of this study was to verify whether the memory of sound position declines as maintenance time increases. In two experiments, we tested the influence of the delay between stimulus and response in a sound localization task. In Experiment 1, blindfolded participants listened to bursts of white noise originating from 16 loudspeakers equally spaced in a 360-degree circular space around the listener in such a way that the nose was aligned to the zero-degree coordinate. Their task was to indicate sounds' position using a digital pointer when prompted at varying delays: 0, 3, and 6 s after stimulus offset. In Experiment 2, the task was analogous to Exp. 1 with stimulus-response delays of 0 or 10 s. Results of the two experiments show that increasing stimulus-response delays up to 10 s do not impair sound localization. Participants systematically overestimated the eccentricity of the auditory stimulus by shifting their responses either toward the 90-degree coordinate, in alignment with the right ear, or toward the 270-degree coordinate, in alignment with the left ear. Such bias was analogous in the front and in the rear azimuthal space and was only marginally influenced by the delay conditions. We conclude that the representation of auditory space in working memory is stable, but directionally biased with systematic overestimation of eccentricity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Directional bias; Eccentricity; Oblique effect; Sound localization; Spatial working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31197624     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00922-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  53 in total

1.  Spatial coordinates of human auditory working memory.

Authors:  J Lewald; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-08

Review 2.  Creating a sense of auditory space.

Authors:  David McAlpine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A place theory of sound localization.

Authors:  L A JEFFRESS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1948-02

4.  Psychophysical verification of predicted interaural differences in localizing distant sound sources.

Authors:  J A Molino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Concurrent minimum audible angle: a re-examination of the concept of auditory spatial acuity.

Authors:  D R Perrott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of relative and absolute sound localization ability in humans.

Authors:  G H Recanzone; S D Makhamra; D C Guard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  A perceptual architecture for sound lateralization in man.

Authors:  Dennis P Phillips
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Interactions of auditory and visual stimuli in space and time.

Authors:  Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory Localisation Biases Increase with Sensory Uncertainty.

Authors:  Sara E Garcia; Pete R Jones; Gary S Rubin; Marko Nardini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Functional Topography of Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Amber M Leaver; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.