Literature DB >> 31570537

Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Jose L Peña1, Fanny Cazettes2, Michael V Beckert3, Brian J Fischer4.   

Abstract

A major cue to infer sound direction is the difference in arrival time of the sound at the left and right ears, called interaural time difference (ITD). The neural coding of ITD and its similarity across species have been strongly debated. In the barn owl, an auditory specialist relying on sound localization to capture prey, ITDs within the physiological range determined by the head width are topographically represented at each frequency. The topographic representation suggests that sound direction may be inferred from the location of maximal neural activity within the map. Such topographical representation of ITD, however, is not evident in mammals. Instead, the preferred ITD of neurons in the mammalian brainstem often lies outside the physiological range and depends on the neuron's best frequency. Because of these disparities, it has been assumed that how spatial hearing is achieved in birds and mammals is fundamentally different. However, recent studies reveal ITD responses in the owl's forebrain and midbrain premotor area that are consistent with coding schemes proposed in mammals. Particularly, sound location in owls could be decoded from the relative firing rates of two broadly and inversely ITD-tuned channels. This evidence suggests that, at downstream stages, the code for ITD may not be qualitatively different across species. Thus, while experimental evidence continues to support the notion of differences in ITD representation across species and brain regions, the latest results indicate notable commonalities, suggesting that codes driving orienting behavior in mammals and birds may be comparable.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31570537      PMCID: PMC6855678          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0873-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  120 in total

1.  Neural sensitivity to interaural time differences: beyond the Jeffress model.

Authors:  D C Fitzpatrick; S Kuwada; R Batra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A place theory of sound localization.

Authors:  L A JEFFRESS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1948-02

4.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; A B Schwartz; R E Kettner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms.

Authors:  G B Henning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Orienting head movements resulting from electrical microstimulation of the brainstem tegmentum in the barn owl.

Authors:  T Masino; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Emergence of an Adaptive Command for Orienting Behavior in Premotor Brainstem Neurons of Barn Owls.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Michael V Beckert; Jose L Pena
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Decoding sound source location and separation using neural population activity patterns.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  4 in total

1.  Two Types of Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields in Different Parts of the Chicken's Midbrain.

Authors:  Gianmarco Maldarelli; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Kettler; Janie M Ondracek; Harald Luksch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Barn Owl's Auditory Space Map Activity Matching Conditions for a Population Vector Readout to Drive Adaptive Sound-Localizing Behavior.

Authors:  Roland Ferger; Keanu Shadron; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Strongly directional responses to tones and conspecific calls in the auditory nerve of the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Paula Kuokkanen; Jamie Emoto Matthews; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Gene delivery to neurons in the auditory brainstem of barn owls using standard recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors.

Authors:  Nadine Thiele; K Jannis Hildebrandt; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Curr Res Neurobiol       Date:  2020-08-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.