Literature DB >> 29759684

How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Ann Clock Eddins1, Erol J Ozmeral2, David A Eddins3.   

Abstract

Over the years, the effect of aging on auditory function has been investigated in animal models and humans in an effort to characterize age-related changes in both perception and physiology. Here, we review how aging may impact neural encoding and processing of binaural and spatial cues in human listeners with a focus on recent work by the authors as well as others. Age-related declines in monaural temporal processing, as estimated from measures of gap detection and temporal fine structure discrimination, have been associated with poorer performance on binaural tasks that require precise temporal processing. In lateralization and localization tasks, as well as in the detection of signals in noise, marked age-related changes have been demonstrated in both behavioral and electrophysiological measures and have been attributed to declines in neural synchrony and reduced central inhibition with advancing age. Evidence for such mechanisms, however, are influenced by the task (passive vs. attending) and the stimulus paradigm (e.g., static vs. continuous with dynamic change). That is, cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) measured in response to static interaural time differences (ITDs) are larger in older versus younger listeners, consistent with reduced inhibition, while continuous stimuli with dynamic ITD changes lead to smaller responses in older compared to younger adults, suggestive of poorer neural synchrony. Additionally, the distribution of cortical activity is broader and less asymmetric in older than younger adults, consistent with the hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults model of cognitive aging. When older listeners attend to selected target locations in the free field, their CAEP components (N1, P2, P3) are again consistently smaller relative to younger listeners, and the reduced asymmetry in the distribution of cortical activity is maintained. As this research matures, proper neural biomarkers for changes in spatial hearing can provide objective evidence of impairment and targets for remediation. Future research should focus on the development and evaluation of effective approaches for remediating these spatial processing deficits associated with aging and hearing loss.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Binaural; Cortical; Electrophysiology; Hemispheric asymmetry; Psychophysics; Spatial

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29759684      PMCID: PMC6196106          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  75 in total

1.  Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity.

Authors:  Karen B Snell; Frances M Mapes; Elizabeth D Hickman; D Robert Frisina
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Reduced temporal processing in older, normal-hearing listeners evident from electrophysiological responses to shifts in interaural time difference.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann C Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Masking level differences for tones and speech in elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms.

Authors:  J H Grose; E A Poth; R W Peters
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-04

5.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Electrophysiological gap detection thresholds: effects of age and comparison with a behavioral measure.

Authors:  Shannon B Palmer; Frank E Musiek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Pádraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-23

Review 8.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jennifer J Lister; Anthony T Cacace; Karen J Cruickshanks; George A Gates; Richard H Wilson; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Opponent Coding of Sound Location (Azimuth) in Planum Temporale is Robust to Sound-Level Variations.

Authors:  Kiki Derey; Giancarlo Valente; Beatrice de Gelder; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  15 in total

1.  Auditory motion tracking ability of adults with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Keng Moua; Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Further Evidence for Individual Ear Consideration in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation.

Authors:  Ankita Patro; Nathan R Lindquist; Jourdan T Holder; Kareem O Tawfik; Matthew R O'Malley; Marc L Bennett; David S Haynes; René Gifford; Elizabeth L Perkins
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.619

3.  Relating Suprathreshold Auditory Processing Abilities to Speech Understanding in Competition.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Laura Coco; Tess K Koerner; E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Michelle R Molis; David A Eddins; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Selective auditory attention modulates cortical responses to sound location change in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  Evaluating the Impact of Age, Acoustic Exposure, and Electrical Stimulation on Binaural Sensitivity in Adult Bilateral Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-06-26

6.  Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Impaired Binaural Hearing in Adults: A Selected Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Influence of Cochlear Implant Use on Perceived Listening Effort in Adult and Pediatric Cases of Unilateral and Asymmetric Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Erin M Lopez; Margaret T Dillon; Lisa R Park; Meredith A Rooth; Margaret E Richter; Nicholas J Thompson; Brendan P O'Connell; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.619

9.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Subjective Benefits of Bimodal Listening in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Asymmetric Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Nicholas J Thompson; Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Andrea L Bucker; Sarah A McCarthy; Ellen J Deres; Brendan P O'Connell; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.591

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.