Literature DB >> 22984224

Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter.

Ayeswarya Ravikumar1, Edwin J Sarver, Raymond A Applegate.   

Abstract

It is well known that the wavefront error (WFE) of the eye varies from individual to individual with pupil diameter (PD) and age. Numerous studies have been proposed evaluating the relationship between visual acuity and WFE, but all these studies were performed with either a fixed or natural PD. It is still not clear if metrics of image quality correlate well with visual acuity independent of PD. Here we investigate the correlation between the change in visual acuity and the change in 30 image quality metrics for a range of optical quality typically established in normal eyes that varies both with age and PD. Visual acuity was recorded for 4 normal subjects using simulated blurred logMAR acuity charts generated from the point spread functions of different scaled WFEs for 6 different PDs (2-7 mm in 1 mm steps). Six image quality metrics (log neural sharpness, log visual Strehl [spatial domain], log visual Strehl [MTF method], log pupil fraction [tessellated], log pupil fraction [concentric area], and log root mean square of WFE slope) accounted for over 80% of variance in change in acuity across all WFEs and all PDs. Multiple regression analysis did not significantly increase the R(2). Simple metrics derived from WFE could potentially act as an objective surrogate to visual acuity without the need for complex models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22984224      PMCID: PMC3580841          DOI: 10.1167/12.10.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  67 in total

1.  Comparison of letter and Vernier acuities with dioptric and diffusive blur.

Authors:  H E Bedell; S Patel; S T Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Optical aberrations of the human cornea as a function of age.

Authors:  A Guirao; M Redondo; P Artal
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Scaling Zernike expansion coefficients to different pupil sizes.

Authors:  Jim Schwiegerling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Refractive error sensing from wavefront slopes.

Authors:  Rafael Navarro
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Age changes in pupil size.

Authors:  J E BIRREN; R C CASPERSON; J BOTWINICK
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1950-07

8.  Monochromatic modulation transfer function of the human eye for different pupil diameters: an analytical expression.

Authors:  P Artal; R Navarro
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  The refraction of the eye in the relation to spherical aberration and pupil size.

Authors:  W N Charman; J A Jennings; H Whitefoot
Journal:  Br J Physiol Opt       Date:  1978

10.  The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti-cataract formulation trials.

Authors:  D B Elliott; M Sheridan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  19 in total

1.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability.

Authors:  Anita Ticak; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Yue Shi; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.018

6.  Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Kelsie B Morrison; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Lan Chi Nguyen; Han Cheng; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Chi Nguyen; Anita Ticak; Darren E Koenig; James D Elswick; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Retinal image quality during accommodation.

Authors:  Norberto López-Gil; Jesson Martin; Tao Liu; Arthur Bradley; David Díaz-Muñoz; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.