Literature DB >> 23757512

Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Yue Shi1, Hope M Queener, Jason D Marsack, Ayeswarya Ravikumar, Harold E Bedell, Raymond A Applegate.   

Abstract

Dynamic registration uncertainty of a wavefront-guided correction with respect to underlying wavefront error (WFE) inevitably decreases retinal image quality. A partial correction may improve average retinal image quality and visual acuity in the presence of registration uncertainties. The purpose of this paper is to (a) develop an algorithm to optimize wavefront-guided correction that improves visual acuity given registration uncertainty and (b) test the hypothesis that these corrections provide improved visual performance in the presence of these uncertainties as compared to a full-magnitude correction or a correction by Guirao, Cox, and Williams (2002). A stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD) algorithm was used to optimize the partial-magnitude correction for three keratoconic eyes based on measured scleral contact lens movement. Given its high correlation with logMAR acuity, the retinal image quality metric log visual Strehl was used as a predictor of visual acuity. Predicted values of visual acuity with the optimized corrections were validated by regressing measured acuity loss against predicted loss. Measured loss was obtained from normal subjects viewing acuity charts that were degraded by the residual aberrations generated by the movement of the full-magnitude correction, the correction by Guirao, and optimized SPGD correction. Partial-magnitude corrections optimized with an SPGD algorithm provide at least one line improvement of average visual acuity over the full magnitude and the correction by Guirao given the registration uncertainty. This study demonstrates that it is possible to improve the average visual acuity by optimizing wavefront-guided correction in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  keratoconus; optical design; registration uncertainty; stochastic parallel gradient descent; wavefront-guided correction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23757512      PMCID: PMC3680305          DOI: 10.1167/13.7.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  41 in total

Review 1.  Design principles and limitations of wave-front guided contact lenses.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.018

2.  Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Xin Hong; Arthur Bradley; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Enhanced visual acuity and image perception following correction of highly aberrated eyes using an adaptive optics visual simulator.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; Laurent Vabre; Nicolas Chateau; Ronald R Krueger
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of defocus on visual acuity as measured by source and observer methods.

Authors:  G Smith; R J Jacobs; C D Chan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Refractive index and osmolality of human tears.

Authors:  J P Craig; P A Simmons; S Patel; A Tomlinson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye's higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  A Guirao; D R Williams; I G Cox
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Correcting anterior corneal aberration and variability of lens movements in keratoconic eyes with back-surface customized soft contact lenses.

Authors:  Minghan Chen; Ramkumar Sabesan; Kamran Ahmad; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Magnitude and orientation of Zernike terms in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Ryo Kosaki; Naoyuki Maeda; Kenichiro Bessho; Yuichi Hori; Kohji Nishida; Asaki Suzaki; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Takashi Fujikado; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Posterior corneal aberrations and their compensation effects on anterior corneal aberrations in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Minghan Chen; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Higher-order aberrations due to the posterior corneal surface in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Tomoya Nakagawa; Naoyuki Maeda; Ryo Kosaki; Yuichi Hori; Tomoyuki Inoue; Makoto Saika; Toshifumi Mihashi; Takashi Fujikado; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  6 in total

1.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy.

Authors:  Lan Chi Nguyen; Gareth D Hastings; Matthew J Kauffman; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  The Relationship Between High-Order Aberration and Anterior Ocular Biometry During Accommodation in Young Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Bilian Ke; Xinjie Mao; Hong Jiang; Jichang He; Che Liu; Min Li; Ying Yuan; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Julianna Z Zanayed; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 6.  Scleral lens for keratoconus: technology update.

Authors:  Varsha M Rathi; Preeji S Mandathara; Mukesh Taneja; Srikanth Dumpati; Virender S Sangwan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.