Literature DB >> 29461409

Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.

Ayeswarya Ravikumar, Julia S Benoit1,2, Kelsie B Morrison1, Jason D Marsack1, Heather A Anderson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Individuals with Down syndrome may experience greater difficulty reliably performing visual acuity (VA) tests because of intellectual disability and limitations in visual quality. This study evaluated the repeatability of acuity (Bailey-Lovie [BL] and HOTV) in subjects with and without Down syndrome.
METHODS: High-contrast VA was measured in both eyes of 30 subjects with Down syndrome (mean, 30 years; range, 18 to 50 years) and 24 control subjects without Down syndrome (mean, 29 years; range, 18 to 50 years). In the Down syndrome group, 23 subjects performed BL, and 7 subjects performed HOTV. All control subjects performed both BL and HOTV, but for HOTV analysis, only seven age-matched control subjects were included. For each eye, subjects performed VA three times on different charts (computer controlled, single-line display) until five total letters were missed on each chart. A repeated-measure ANOVA was used to compare the acuity measures between groups.
RESULTS: The average logMAR VA for subjects with Down syndrome was approximately six lines worse than the control subjects (BL: Down syndrome = right eye: 0.51 ± 0.16, left eye: 0.53 ± 0.18; control = right eye: -0.06 ± 0.06, left eye: -0.06 ± 0.08, P < .0001; HOTV: Down syndrome = right eye: 0.47 ± 0.19, left eye: 0.46 ± 0.16; control: right eye = -0.11 ± 0.09, left eye: -0.07 ± 0.07, P < .001). Bailey-Lovie VA repeatability (1.96 * Sw * √2) was 0.13 logMAR (6.5 letters) for Down syndrome and 0.09 logMAR (4.5 letters) for control subjects. HOTV VA repeatability was 0.16 logMAR (eight letters) for both Down syndrome and control subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite poorer acuity in individuals with Down syndrome, repeatability of VA measurements was comparable to control subjects for both BL and HOTV techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29461409      PMCID: PMC5822740          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  34 in total

Review 1.  Preschool vision screening: summary of a Task Force report. Behalf of the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the National Eye Institute Task Force on Vision Screening in the Preschool Child.

Authors:  E E Hartmann; V Dobson; L Hainline; W Marsh-Tootle; G E Quinn; M S Ruttum; P P Schmidt; K Simons
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Comparison of Whole Eye versus First-Surface Astigmatism in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Rachel Knowlton; Jason D Marsack; Norman E Leach; Ralph J Herring; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  New visual acuity test for pre-school children.

Authors:  L Hyvärinen; R Näsänen; P Laurinen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1980-08

4.  Corneal higher-order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology.

Authors:  Takahiro Hiraoka; Yujiro Matsumoto; Fumiki Okamoto; Tatsuo Yamaguchi; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Refractive development in children with Down's syndrome: a population based, longitudinal study.

Authors:  O H Haugen; G Høvding; I Lundström
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Association between accommodative accuracy, hypermetropia, and strabismus in children with Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Ruth E Stewart; J Margaret Woodhouse; Mary Cregg; Valerie H Pakeman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Prevalence of ocular abnormalities in adults with Down syndrome in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Angie Hon Chi Fong; Jennifer Shum; Alex L K Ng; Kenneth K W Li; Sarah McGhee; David Wong
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti-cataract formulation trials.

Authors:  D B Elliott; M Sheridan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts.

Authors:  B C Reeves; J M Wood; A R Hill
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  6 in total

1.  Visual Acuity Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Wavefront Metric-optimized Refractions in Adults with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Jason D Marsack; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Karen D Fern
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.106

2.  Image Quality Metric Derived Refractions Predicted to Improve Visual Acuity Beyond Habitual Refraction for Patients With Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Understanding the Impact of Individual Perceived Image Quality Features on Visual Performance.

Authors:  Julia S Benoit; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Impact of Pupil Diameter on Objective Refraction Determination and Predicted Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Ayeswary Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  A Randomized Trial of Objective Spectacle Prescriptions for Adults with Down Syndrome: Baseline Data and Methods.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Julia S Benoit; Jason D Marsack; Ruth E Manny; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Karen D Fern; Kelsey R Trast
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.106

6.  Can Tinted Lenses Be Used to Manipulate Pupil Size and Visual Performance When Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses?

Authors:  Hyung Min Park; Young Uk Ryu; Inn-Jee Park; Byoung Sun Chu
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-03-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.