Literature DB >> 31185094

Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Sangeetha Metlapally1, Shrikant R Bharadwaj2, Austin Roorda1, Vinay Kumar Nilagiri2, Tiffanie T Yu1, Clifton M Schor1.   

Abstract

Stereoacuity losses are induced by increased magnitudes and interocular differences in high-order aberrations (HOAs). This study used keratoconus as a model to investigate the impact of HOAs on disparity processing and stereoacuity. HOAs and stereoacuity were quantified in subjects with keratoconus (n = 21) with HOAs uncorrected (wearing spectacles) or minimized (wearing rigid gas-permeable contact lenses) and in control subjects without keratoconus (n = 5) for 6-mm pupil diameters. Disparity signal quality was estimated using metrics derived from binocular cross-correlation functions of stereo pairs convolved with point-spread functions from these HOAs. Metrics computed for all subjects were compared with stereoacuities. The effects of contrast losses and phase shifts on disparity signal quality were studied independently by manipulating the amplitude and phase components of optical transfer functions. The magnitudes, orientations, interocular relationships in magnitude, and shape of the point-spread function affected the cross-correlation metrics that determine disparity signal quality. Stereoacuity covaries strongly with cross-correlation metrics and moderately with image-quality metrics. Both phase distortions and contrast losses due to HOAs significantly influence computations of binocular disparity. HOA-induced stereoacuity reductions are attributable to disparity blur and noise from image properties that reduce the height and kurtosis of the peak stimulus disparity match of the cross-correlation. Phase distortions and contrast losses due to HOAs are both partly responsible for the greater stereoacuity losses seen with spectacles compared to rigid gas-permeable contact lenses in keratoconus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31185094      PMCID: PMC6559754          DOI: 10.1167/19.6.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  49 in total

1.  Stereopsis and contrast.

Authors:  G E Legge; Y C Gu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The functional significance of stereopsis.

Authors:  Anna R O'Connor; Eileen E Birch; Susan Anderson; Hayley Draper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Development of a questionnaire for measurement of vision-related quality of life.

Authors:  N A Frost; J M Sparrow; J S Durant; J L Donovan; T J Peters; S T Brookes
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.648

4.  Interactions of spatial frequency and unequal monocular contrasts in stereopsis.

Authors:  L K Cormack; S B Stevenson; D D Landers
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Effect of naturally occurring visual acuity differences between two eyes in stereoacuity.

Authors:  A K Lam; A S Chau; W Y Lam; G Y Leung; B S Man
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: an empirical and theoretical study.

Authors:  B Gillam; D Chambers; B Lawergren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-11

7.  Stereopsis with spatially-degraded images.

Authors:  I C Wood
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  A computational model of binocular depth perception.

Authors:  J E Mayhew; H C Longuet-Higgins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  LogMAR and Stereoacuity in Keratoconus Corrected with Spectacles and Rigid Gas-permeable Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Sangeetha Metlapally; Parthasarathi Kalaiselvan; Clifton M Schor; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?

Authors:  Praveen K Bandela; PremNandhini Satgunam; Prashant Garg; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contrast Rivalry Paradigm Reveals Suppression of Monocular Input in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Bhagya Lakshmi Marella; Miriam L Conway; Catherine Suttle; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Keratoconus and Visual Performance with Different Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Ana Marta; João Heitor Marques; Daniel Almeida; Diana José; Irene Barbosa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.