Literature DB >> 22978898

Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.

Jae Hee Lee1, Larry E Humes.   

Abstract

This study investigated the benefits of differences between sentences in fundamental frequency (F0) and temporal onset for sentence pairs among listener groups differing in age and hearing sensitivity. Two experiments were completed with the primary difference between experiments being the way in which the stimuli were presented. Experiment 1 used blocked stimulus presentation, which ultimately provided redundant acoustic cues to mark the target sentence in each pair, whereas Experiment 2 sampled a slightly more restricted stimulus space, but in a completely randomized presentation order. For both experiments, listeners were required to detect a cue word ("Baron") for the target sentence in each pair and to then identify the target words (color, number) that appeared later in the target sentence. Results of Experiment 1 showed that F0 or onset separation cues were beneficial to both cue-word detection and color-number identification performance. There were no significant differences across groups in the ability to detect the cue word, but groups differed in their ability to identify the correct color-number words. Elderly adults with impaired hearing had the greatest difficulty with the identification task despite the application of spectral shaping to restore the audibility of the speech stimuli. For the most part, the primary results of Experiment 1 were replicated in Experiment 2, although, in the latter experiment, all older adults, whether they had normal or impaired hearing, performed worse than young adults with normal hearing. From Experiment 2, the benefits received for a difference in F0 between talkers of 6 semitones were equivalent to those received for an onset asynchrony of 300 ms between sentences and, for such conditions, the combination of both sound-segregation cues resulted in an additive benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22978898      PMCID: PMC3460987          DOI: 10.1121/1.4740482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  64 in total

1.  Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; J F Culling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Perception of concurrent vowels: effects of harmonic misalignment and pitch-period asynchrony.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; P F Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory enhancement and the perception of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; P F Assmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

4.  The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: pulse train segregation and vowel segregation.

Authors:  M H Chalikia; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

Review 5.  Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion.

Authors:  I R Murray; J L Arnott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating.

Authors:  J F Culling; C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.

Authors:  J F Culling; C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age-related changes in auditory brainstem responses in Fischer 344 rats: effects of rate and intensity.

Authors:  P M Backoff; D M Caspary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  R Meddis; M J Hewitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  30 in total

1.  Effects of auditory selective attention on neural phase: individual differences and short-term training.

Authors:  Aeron Laffere; Fred Dick; Adam Tierney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lexical Influences on Errors in Masked Speech Perception in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Exploring Use of the Coordinate Response Measure in a Multitalker Babble Paradigm.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Competing Speech Perception in Middle Age.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

10.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.