Literature DB >> 2813035

The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: pulse train segregation and vowel segregation.

M H Chalikia, A S Bregman.   

Abstract

In the experiments reported here, we attempted to find out more about how the auditory system is able to separate two simultaneous harmonic sounds. Previous research (Halikia & Bregman, 1984a, 1984b; Scheffers, 1983a) had indicated that a difference in fundamental frequency (F0) between two simultaneous vowel sounds improves their separate identification. In the present experiments, we looked at the effect of F0s that changed as a function of time. In Experiment 1, pairs of unfiltered or filtered pulse trains were used. Some were steady-state, and others had gliding F0s; different F0 separations were also used. The subjects had to indicate whether they had heard one or two sounds. The results showed that increased F0 differences and gliding F0s facilitated the perceptual separation of simultaneous sounds. In Experiments 2 and 3, simultaneous synthesized vowels were used on frequency contours that were steady-state, gliding in parallel (parallel glides), or gliding in opposite directions (crossing glides). The results showed that crossing glides led to significantly better vowel identification than did steady-state F0s. Also, in certain cases, crossing glides were more effective than parallel glides. The superior effect of the crossing glides could be due to the common frequency modulation of the harmonics within each component of the vowel pair and the consequent decorrelation of the harmonics between the two simultaneous vowels.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2813035     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Failures of attention in selective listening.

Authors:  D E BROADBENT
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-12

2.  Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; R W Peters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Grouping of vowel harmonics by frequency modulation: absence of effects on phonemic categorization.

Authors:  R B Gardner; C J Darwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

4.  Some experiments relating to the perception of complex tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R B Gardner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones.

Authors:  B C Moore; R W Peters; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Successive versus simultaneous comparison in auditory intensity discrimination.

Authors:  D M Green; G Kidd; M C Picardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Measurement of pitch in speech: an implementation of Goldstein's theory of pitch perception.

Authors:  H Duifhuis; L F Willems; R J Sluyter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Simulation of auditory analysis of pitch: an elaboration on the DWS pitch meter.

Authors:  M T Scheffers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  17 in total

1.  The effect of vibrato on the recognition of masked vowels.

Authors:  L Demany; C Semal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

2.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to double harmonic tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Spectral processing and sound source determination.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

4.  Concurrent-vowel and tone recognitions in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal coding of concurrent acoustic signals in auditory midbrain.

Authors:  D A Bodnar; A H Bass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The cocktail party effect in infants.

Authors:  R S Newman; P W Jusczyk
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

9.  The perceptual segregation of simultaneous vowels with harmonic, shifted, or random components.

Authors:  M H Chalikia; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-02

10.  Perceptual organization of auditory temporal patterns in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  R F Braaten; S H Hulse
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.