Literature DB >> 1354375

Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence.

Q Summerfield1, J F Culling.   

Abstract

Four experiments sought evidence that listeners can use coherent changes in the frequency or amplitude of harmonics to segregate concurrent vowels. Segregation was not helped by giving the harmonics of competing vowels different patterns of frequency or amplitude modulation. However, modulating the frequencies of the components of one vowel was beneficial when the other vowel was not modulated, provided that both vowels were composed of components placed randomly in frequency. In addition, staggering the onsets of the two vowels, so that the amplitude of one vowel increased abruptly while the amplitude of the other was stationary, was also beneficial. Thus, the results demonstrate that listeners can group changing harmonics and can segregate them from stationary harmonics, but cannot use coherence of change to separate two sets of changing harmonics.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1354375     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  12 in total

1.  Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Stephanie Tiaden; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.

Authors:  T Y C Ching; E van Wanrooy; H Dillon
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

5.  Effects of pulsing of a target tone on the ability to hear it out in different types of complex sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cortical mechanisms for the segregation and representation of acoustic textures.

Authors:  Tobias Overath; Sukhbinder Kumar; Lauren Stewart; Katharina von Kriegstein; Rhodri Cusack; Adrian Rees; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effects of Physiological Internal Noise on Model Predictions of Concurrent Vowel Identification for Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Mark S Hedrick; Il Joon Moon; Jihwan Woo; Jong Ho Won
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inharmonic speech reveals the role of harmonicity in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Sara Popham; Dana Boebinger; Dan P W Ellis; Hideki Kawahara; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Retroactive Streaming Fails to Improve Concurrent Vowel Identification.

Authors:  Eugene J Brandewie; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Binaural Pitch Fusion: Effects of Amplitude Modulation.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.