Literature DB >> 32165265

Effects of auditory selective attention on neural phase: individual differences and short-term training.

Aeron Laffere1, Fred Dick2, Adam Tierney3.   

Abstract

How does the brain follow a sound that is mixed with others in a noisy environment? One possible strategy is to allocate attention to task-relevant time intervals. Prior work has linked auditory selective attention to alignment of neural modulations with stimulus temporal structure. However, since this prior research used relatively easy tasks and focused on analysis of main effects of attention across participants, relatively little is known about the neural foundations of individual differences in auditory selective attention. Here we investigated individual differences in auditory selective attention by asking participants to perform a 1-back task on a target auditory stream while ignoring a distractor auditory stream presented 180° out of phase. Neural entrainment to the attended auditory stream was strongly linked to individual differences in task performance. Some variability in performance was accounted for by degree of musical training, suggesting a link between long-term auditory experience and auditory selective attention. To investigate whether short-term improvements in auditory selective attention are possible, we gave participants 2 ​h of auditory selective attention training and found improvements in both task performance and enhancements of the effects of attention on neural phase angle. Our results suggest that although there exist large individual differences in auditory selective attention and attentional modulation of neural phase angle, this skill improves after a small amount of targeted training.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Auditory; EEG; Rhythm; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32165265      PMCID: PMC7577583          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  76 in total

1.  Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians.

Authors:  Antoine Shahin; Daniel J Bosnyak; Laurel J Trainor; Larry E Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Musicians at the Cocktail Party: Neural Substrates of Musical Training During Selective Listening in Multispeaker Situations.

Authors:  Sebastian Puschmann; Sylvain Baillet; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Motor origin of temporal predictions in auditory attention.

Authors:  Benjamin Morillon; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Neural Entrainment and Attentional Selection in the Listening Brain.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Dynamics of Active Sensing and perceptual selection.

Authors:  Charles E Schroeder; Donald A Wilson; Thomas Radman; Helen Scharfman; Peter Lakatos
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; Nai Ding; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Catherine A Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald Emerson; Ashesh D Mehta; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Attentional gain control of ongoing cortical speech representations in a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Jess R Kerlin; Antoine J Shahin; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Audiomotor Perceptual Training Enhances Speech Intelligibility in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jonathon P Whitton; Kenneth E Hancock; Jeffrey M Shannon; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds.

Authors:  Sara M K Madsen; Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Slow phase-locked modulations support selective attention to sound.

Authors:  Magdalena Kachlicka; Aeron Laffere; Fred Dick; Adam Tierney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 7.400

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.