Literature DB >> 22864188

DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.

P Gill1, L Gusmão, H Haned, W R Mayr, N Morling, W Parson, L Prieto, M Prinz, H Schneider, P M Schneider, B S Weir.   

Abstract

DNA profiling of biological material from scenes of crimes is often complicated because the amount of DNA is limited and the quality of the DNA may be compromised. Furthermore, the sensitivity of STR typing kits has been continuously improved to detect low level DNA traces. This may lead to (1) partial DNA profiles and (2) detection of additional alleles. There are two key phenomena to consider: allelic or locus 'drop-out', i.e. 'missing' alleles at one or more genetic loci, while 'drop-in' may explain alleles in the DNA profile that are additional to the assumed main contributor(s). The drop-in phenomenon is restricted to 1 or 2 alleles per profile. If multiple alleles are observed at more than two loci then these are considered as alleles from an extra contributor and analysis can proceed as a mixture of two or more contributors. Here, we give recommendations on how to estimate probabilities considering drop-out, Pr(D), and drop-in, Pr(C). For reasons of clarity, we have deliberately restricted the current recommendations considering drop-out and/or drop-in at only one locus. Furthermore, we offer recommendations on how to use Pr(D) and Pr(C) with the likelihood ratio principles that are generally recommended by the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG) as measure of the weight of the evidence in forensic genetics. Examples of calculations are included. An Excel spreadsheet is provided so that scientists and laboratories may explore the models and input their own data.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22864188      PMCID: PMC4689582          DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  18 in total

1.  Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations.

Authors:  J M Curran; C M Triggs; J Buckleton; B S Weir
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA.

Authors:  P Gill; J Whitaker; C Flaxman; N Brown; J Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples.

Authors:  M W Perlin; B Szabady
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.832

4.  A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis.

Authors:  J P Whitaker; E A Cotton; P Gill
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Paternity Testing Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on genetic investigations in paternity cases.

Authors:  Niels Morling; Robert W Allen; Angel Carracedo; Helena Geada; Francois Guidet; Charlotte Hallenberg; Wolfgang Martin; Wolfgang R Mayr; Bjørnar Olaisen; Vince L Pascali; Peter M Schneider
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.

Authors:  J M Curran; P Gill; M R Bill
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Is the 2p rule always conservative?

Authors:  John Buckleton; Christopher Triggs
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures.

Authors:  P Gill; C H Brenner; J S Buckleton; A Carracedo; M Krawczak; W R Mayr; N Morling; M Prinz; P M Schneider; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  ISFG: Recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing.

Authors:  David W Gjertson; Charles H Brenner; Max P Baur; Angel Carracedo; Francois Guidet; Juan A Luque; Rüdiger Lessig; Wolfgang R Mayr; Vince L Pascali; Mechthild Prinz; Peter M Schneider; Niels Morling
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.882

10.  A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci.

Authors:  Peter Gill; James Curran; Keith Elliot
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  24 in total

1.  Evaluation of mixed-source, low-template DNA profiles in forensic science.

Authors:  David J Balding
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modeling one complete versus triplicate analyses in low template DNA typing.

Authors:  Jianye Ge; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  A response to "Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look" by Lund and Iyer.

Authors:  Simone Gittelson; Charles E H Berger; Graham Jackson; Ian W Evett; Christophe Champod; Bernard Robertson; James M Curran; Duncan Taylor; Bruce S Weir; Michael D Coble; John S Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  The ancient Yakuts: a population genetic enigma.

Authors:  Christine Keyser; Clémence Hollard; Angela Gonzalez; Jean-Luc Fausser; Eric Rivals; Anatoly Nikolayevich Alexeev; Alexandre Riberon; Eric Crubézy; Bertrand Ludes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The future of forensic DNA analysis.

Authors:  John M Butler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.

Authors:  Klaas-Jan Slooten; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Models and implementation for relationship problems with dropout.

Authors:  Guro Dørum; Daniel Kling; Carlos Baeza-Richer; Manuel García-Magariños; Solve Sæbø; Stijn Desmyter; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  The forensic value of X-linked markers in mixed-male DNA analysis.

Authors:  HaiJun He; Lagabaiyila Zha; JinHong Cai; Jian Huang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.

Authors:  Harish Swaminathan; Muhammad O Qureshi; Catherine M Grgicak; Ken Duffy; Desmond S Lun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.