Literature DB >> 26160753

Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.

Klaas-Jan Slooten1,2, Thore Egeland3.   

Abstract

The statistical evidence obtained from mixed DNA profiles can be summarised in several ways in forensic casework including the likelihood ratio (LR) and the Random Man Not Excluded (RMNE) probability. The literature has seen a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of likelihood ratios and exclusion probabilities, and part of our aim is to bring some clarification to this debate. In a previous paper, we proved that there is a general mathematical relationship between these statistics: RMNE can be expressed as a certain average of the LR, implying that the expected value of the LR, when applied to an actual contributor to the mixture, is at least equal to the inverse of the RMNE. While the mentioned paper presented applications for kinship problems, the current paper demonstrates the relevance for mixture cases, and for this purpose, we prove some new general properties. We also demonstrate how to use the distribution of the likelihood ratio for donors of a mixture, to obtain estimates for exceedance probabilities of the LR for non-donors, of which the RMNE is a special case corresponding to L R>0. In order to derive these results, we need to view the likelihood ratio as a random variable. In this paper, we describe how such a randomization can be achieved. The RMNE is usually invoked only for mixtures without dropout. In mixtures, artefacts like dropout and drop-in are commonly encountered and we address this situation too, illustrating our results with a basic but widely implemented model, a so-called binary model. The precise definitions, modelling and interpretation of the required concepts of dropout and drop-in are not entirely obvious, and we attempt to clarify them here in a general likelihood framework for a binary model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA mixtures; Exclusion probabilities; Weight of evidence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26160753     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1217-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  12 in total

1.  Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.

Authors:  J M Curran; P Gill; M R Bill
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  A discussion of the merits of random man not excluded and likelihood ratios.

Authors:  John Buckleton; James Curran
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.882

3.  Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to kinship problems.

Authors:  Klaas-Jan Slooten; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Interpreting low template DNA profiles.

Authors:  David J Balding; John Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 4.882

5.  Potentials and limits of pairwise kinship analysis using autosomal short tandem repeat loci.

Authors:  Michael Nothnagel; Jörg Schmidtke; Michael Krawczak
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  p-values should not be used for evaluating the strength of DNA evidence.

Authors:  Maarten Kruijver; Ronald Meester; Klaas Slooten
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  A new methodological framework to interpret complex DNA profiles using likelihood ratios.

Authors:  P Gill; H Haned
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.882

8.  Models and implementation for relationship problems with dropout.

Authors:  Guro Dørum; Daniel Kling; Carlos Baeza-Richer; Manuel García-Magariños; Solve Sæbø; Stijn Desmyter; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Comparing six commercial autosomal STR kits in a large Dutch population sample.

Authors:  Antoinette A Westen; Thirsa Kraaijenbrink; Elizaveta A Robles de Medina; Joyce Harteveld; Patricia Willemse; Sofia B Zuniga; Kristiaan J van der Gaag; Natalie E C Weiler; Jeroen Warnaar; Manfred Kayser; Titia Sijen; Peter de Knijff
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.882

10.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.

Authors:  P Gill; L Gusmão; H Haned; W R Mayr; N Morling; W Parson; L Prieto; M Prinz; H Schneider; P M Schneider; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.882

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.

Authors:  Guro Dørum; Daniel Kling; Andreas Tillmar; Magnus Dehli Vigeland; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.

Authors:  Thore Egeland; Klaas Slooten
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Efficient construction of match strength distributions for uncertain multi-locus genotypes.

Authors:  Mark W Perlin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-10-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.