Literature DB >> 29802461

Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Ruiyang Tao1,2, Shouyu Wang1, Jiashuo Zhang2,3, Jingyi Zhang2,3, Zihao Yang2,4, Xiang Sheng2,3, Yiping Hou1, Suhua Zhang5, Chengtao Li6,7.   

Abstract

Interpreting mixed DNA samples containing material from multiple contributors has long been considered a major challenge in forensic casework, especially when encountering low-template DNA (LT-DNA) or high-order mixtures that may involve missing alleles (dropout) and unrelated alleles (drop-in), among others. In the last decades, extraordinary progress has been made in the analysis of mixed DNA samples, which has led to increasing attention to this research field. The advent of new methods for the separation and extraction of DNA from mixtures, novel or jointly applied genetic markers for detection and reliable interpretation approaches for estimating the weight of evidence, as well as the powerful massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technology, has greatly extended the range of mixed samples that can be correctly analyzed. Here, we summarized the investigative approaches and progress in the field of forensic DNA mixture analysis, hoping to provide some assistance to forensic practitioners and to promote further development involving this issue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forensic genetics; Genetic markers; MPS; Mixture; Separation/extraction DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29802461     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-018-1862-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  133 in total

1.  Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?

Authors:  Hinda Haned; Laurent Pène; Jean R Lobry; Anne B Dufour; Dominique Pontier
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 2.  DNA Extraction on Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  J M Bienvenue; J P Landers
Journal:  Forensic Sci Rev       Date:  2010-07

3.  Validation of a combined autosomal/Y-chromosomal STR approach for analyzing typical biological stains in sexual-assault cases.

Authors:  Josephine Purps; Maria Geppert; Marion Nagy; Lutz Roewer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.882

4.  2006 GEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mtDNA: reflections about interpretation, artefacts, and DNA mixtures.

Authors:  L Prieto; A Alonso; C Alves; M Crespillo; M Montesino; A Picornell; A Brehm; J L Ramírez; M R Whittle; M J Anjos; I Boschi; J Buj; M Cerezo; S Cardoso; R Cicarelli; D Comas; D Corach; C Doutremepuich; R M Espinheira; I Fernández-Fernández; S Filippini; Julia Garcia-Hirschfeld; A González; B Heinrichs; A Hernández; F P N Leite; R P Lizarazo; A M López-Parra; M López-Soto; J A Lorente; B Mechoso; I Navarro; S Pagano; J J Pestano; J Puente; E Raimondi; A Rodríguez-Quesada; M F Terra-Pinheiro; L Vidal-Rioja; C Vullo; A Salas
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.882

5.  FACS separation of non-compromised forensically relevant biological mixtures.

Authors:  Timothy J Verdon; R John Mitchell; Weisan Chen; Kun Xiao; Roland A H van Oorschot
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.

Authors:  Guro Dørum; Øyvind Bleka; Peter Gill; Hinda Haned; Lars Snipen; Solve Sæbø; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  Second generation sequencing of three STRs D3S1358, D12S391 and D21S11 in Danes and a new nomenclature for sequenced STR alleles.

Authors:  Chiara Gelardi; Eszter Rockenbauer; Sigrun Dalsgaard; Claus Børsting; Niels Morling
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.882

8.  Mitochondrial DNA typing of laser-captured single sperm cells to differentiate individuals in a mixed semen stain.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Mei Ding; Hao Pang; Jiaxin Xing; Jinfeng Xuan; Chunhong Wang; Ziqing Lin; Song Han; Kewei Liang; Chunmei Li; Jun Yao; Baojie Wang
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.

Authors:  P Gill; L Gusmão; H Haned; W R Mayr; N Morling; W Parson; L Prieto; M Prinz; H Schneider; P M Schneider; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.882

10.  Suspension fluorescence in situ hybridization (S-FISH) combined with automatic detection and laser microdissection for STR profiling of male cells in male/female mixtures.

Authors:  Mado Vandewoestyne; David Van Hoofstat; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.686

View more
  5 in total

1.  Validation of the Investigator 24plex QS Kit: a 6-dye multiplex PCR assay for forensic application in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Chong Chen; Xiang Sheng; Ruocheng Xia; Xiaochun Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2019-12-06

2.  A New Computational Deconvolution Algorithm for the Analysis of Forensic DNA Mixtures with SNP Markers.

Authors:  Yu Yin; Peng Zhang; Yu Xing
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.

Authors:  Sarah K Schellhammer; Brittany C Hudson; Jordan O Cox; Tracey Dawson Green
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.717

Review 4.  Application of Y-STR, DIP-STR and SNP-STR Markers in Interpretation of Forensic Genetic Profiling: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mehdi Forouzesh; Shiva Irani; Azam Soleimani; Seyed Jalil Monabati
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Interpreting Mixture Profiles: Comparison between Precision ID GlobalFiler™ NGS STR Panel v2 and Traditional Methods.

Authors:  Michele Ragazzo; Stefania Carboni; Valerio Caputo; Carlotta Buttini; Laura Manzo; Valeria Errichiello; Giulio Puleri; Emiliano Giardina
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.