Literature DB >> 10486951

Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations.

J M Curran1, C M Triggs, J Buckleton, B S Weir.   

Abstract

DNA profiles from multiple-contributor samples are interpreted by comparing the probabilities of the profiles under alternative propositions. The propositions may specify some known contributors to the sample and may also specify a number of unknown contributors. The probability of the alleles carried by the set of people, known or unknown, depends on the allelic frequencies and also upon any relationships among the people. Membership of the same subpopulation implies a relationship from a shared evolutionary history, and this effect has been incorporated into the probabilities. This acknowledgment of the effects of population structure requires account to be taken of all people in a subpopulation who are typed, whether or not they contributed to the sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10486951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  16 in total

1.  The statistical evaluation of DNA mixtures with contributors from different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Wing K Fung; Yue-Qing Hu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Evaluating forensic DNA mixtures with contributors of different structured ethnic origins: a computer software.

Authors:  Yue-Qing Hu; Wing K Fung
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile.

Authors:  Thore Egeland; Ingvild Dalen; Petter F Mostad
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.

Authors:  Guro Dørum; Daniel Kling; Andreas Tillmar; Magnus Dehli Vigeland; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Identifying contributors of two-person DNA mixtures by familial database search.

Authors:  Yuk-Ka Chung; Wing K Fung
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies.

Authors:  Amanda B Hepler; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  Population-specific FST values for forensic STR markers: A worldwide survey.

Authors:  John Buckleton; James Curran; Jérôme Goudet; Duncan Taylor; Alexandre Thiery; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.882

8.  Confidence interval of the likelihood ratio associated with mixed stain DNA evidence.

Authors:  Gary W Beecham; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 1.832

9.  The interpretation of lineage markers in forensic DNA testing.

Authors:  J S Buckleton; M Krawczak; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.882

10.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.

Authors:  P Gill; L Gusmão; H Haned; W R Mayr; N Morling; W Parson; L Prieto; M Prinz; H Schneider; P M Schneider; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.