Literature DB >> 22806317

Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

F Pelliccia1, V Pasceri, A Evangelista, A Pergolini, F Barillà, N Viceconte, G Tanzilli, M Schiariti, C Greco, C Gaudio.   

Abstract

Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography (CT) scanners is feasible with high sensitivity and negative predictive value. The radiation exposure associated with this technique, however, is high and concerns in the widespread use of CT have arisen. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography using 320-row CT, which avoids exposure-intensive overscanning and overranging. We prospectively studied 118 unselected consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). All patients had 320-row CT within 1 week of ICA, which, together with quantitative analysis, served as the reference standard. Of the 65 out of 118 patients who were diagnosed as having CAD by ICA, 64 (98 %) were correctly identified at 320-row CT. Noteworthy, 320-row CT correctly detected CAD in 3 patients with atrial fibrillation and ruled out the disease in the other 8 patients. From 151 significant coronary stenoses detected on ICA, 137 (91 %) were correctly identified with 320-row CT. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity and specificity of 320-row CT were 98 and 91 %, respectively. In the per-vessel analysis, sensitivity and specificity of 320-row CT were 93 and 95 %, respectively. In the per segment analysis, sensitivity and specificity of 320-row CT were 91 and 99 %, respectively. Diameter stenosis determined with the use of CT showed good correlation with ICA (P < 0.001, R = 0.81) without significant underestimation or overestimation (-3.1 ± 24.4 %; P = 0.08). Comparison of CT with ICA revealed a significantly smaller effective radiation dose (3.1 ± 2.3 vs. 6.5 ± 4.2 mSv; P < 0.05) and amount of contrast agent required (99 ± 51 vs. 65 ± 42 ml, P < 0.05) for 320 row CT. The present study in an unselected population including patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrates that 320-row CT may significantly reduce the radiation dose and amount of contrast agent required compared with ICA while maintaining a very high diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806317     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0095-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  31 in total

1.  Multislice CT coronary angiography: evaluation of an automatic vessel detection tool.

Authors:  M Dewey; D Schnapauff; M Laule; A Lembcke; A C Borges; W Rutsch; B Hamm; P Rogalla
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-04

2.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Tobias Goroll; Martin Seltmann; Tobias Pflederer; Katharina Anders; Dieter Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Michael Uder; Michael Lell; Mohamed Marwan
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-04

4.  Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT.

Authors:  Patrick A Hein; Valentina C Romano; Alexander Lembcke; Juliane May; Patrik Rogalla
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography.

Authors:  Duncan R Coles; Mary A Smail; Ian S Negus; Peter Wilde; Martin Oberhoff; Karl R Karsch; Andreas Baumbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography with 320-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Arthur Nasis; Michael C Leung; Paul R Antonis; James D Cameron; Sam J Lehman; Sarah A Hope; Marcus P Crossett; John M Troupis; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms.

Authors:  J H Reiber; P W Serruys; C J Kooijman; W Wijns; C J Slager; J J Gerbrands; J C Schuurbiers; A den Boer; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation.

Authors:  Florian J Engelken; Alexander Lembcke; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  CT angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: a transformation in cardiovascular CT practice.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Mansour Al Moudi; Yan Cao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Coronary CT angiography: Diagnostic value and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 3.  Beta-blocker administration protocol for prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

4.  CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis.

Authors:  Tobias A Fuchs; Michael Fiechter; Cathérine Gebhard; Julia Stehli; Jelena R Ghadri; Egle Kazakauskaite; Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG gating based on step-and-shoot, Flash and volume modes for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Linfeng Yang; Tao Zhou; Ruijie Zhang; Lin Xu; Zhaohui Peng; Juan Ding; Sen Wang; Min Li; Gang Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Impact of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy of second generation 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nitesh Nerlekar; Brian S Ko; Arthur Nasis; James D Cameron; Michael Leung; Adam J Brown; Dennis T L Wong; Philip J Ngu; John M Troupis; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 7.  Sudden death and physical exercise: timely diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries with the new 320-slide multi-detector computed tomography.

Authors:  Carlo Gaudio; Francesco Pelliccia; Antonietta Evangelista; Nicola Viceconte; Cesare Greco; Ferdinando Franzoni; Fabio Galetta; Giuseppe Speziale; Antonio Pelliccia
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Leo; Erica Fisci; Francesco Secchi; Marco Alì; Federico Ambrogi; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The Impact of Different Levels of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D on Image Quality of 320-Row Coronary CT Angiography: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sarah Feger; Matthias Rief; Elke Zimmermann; Peter Martus; Joanne Désirée Schuijf; Jörg Blobel; Felicitas Richter; Marc Dewey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents--Intraindividual Comparison.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Sarah Feger; Peter Martus; Michael Laule; Marc Dewey; Eva Schönenberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.