Literature DB >> 19124110

Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation.

Florian J Engelken1, Alexander Lembcke, Bernd Hamm, Marc Dewey.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Scanning parameters used in multislice computed tomographic (MSCT) coronary angiography should be adapted to patients' heart rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of success of a software-assisted scan simulation to determine optimal gantry rotation time prior to MSCT coronary angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 218 64-slice MSCT coronary angiographic studies were retrospectively analyzed. Prior to the MSCT examination, a scan had been simulated by giving a breath-hold command, after which a software program recorded the patient's heart rate from an electrocardiogram over the expected scanning time and predicted optimal scanning parameters. The success rate in predicting optimal parameters for the subsequent MSCT examination and the resulting acquisition window width were analyzed.
RESULTS: There was a wide range of heart rates among the patients. The mean intraindividual variation during scan simulation and examination was 4.8 beats/min. Optimal scan parameters were selected in 179 of 218 cases (82%). The median acquisition window width achieved in this group was 174 ms (range, 100-200), compared with 192 ms (range, 149-225) in cases in which suboptimal settings were selected (P < .001). Correct prediction occurred significantly more often in patients with low heart rates (<66 beats/min) than in those with higher heart rates (>or=66 beats/min) (93% vs 66%; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The software-assisted scan simulation was a fast and simple procedure that allowed the selection of optimal computed tomographic parameters in >80% of patients. The procedure may be a useful adjunct to avoid unwanted synchronicity of gantry rotation and heart cycle and optimize temporal resolution in MSCT coronary angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19124110     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  4 in total

1.  Indications, imaging technique, and reading of cardiac computed tomography: survey of clinical practice.

Authors:  M H Maurer; E Zimmermann; P Schlattmann; C Germershausen; B Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  F Pelliccia; V Pasceri; A Evangelista; A Pergolini; F Barillà; N Viceconte; G Tanzilli; M Schiariti; C Greco; C Gaudio
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Andrea L Vavere; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Julie M Miller; Leonardo Sara; Christopher Cox; Ilan Gottlieb; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Narinder Paul; John Hoe; Albert de Roos; Albert C Lardo; Joao A Lima; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Diagnostic performance of 320-detector CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: preliminary results.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Lin Yang; Zhanming Fan; Wei Yu; Biao Lv; Zhaoqi Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.