Literature DB >> 22771941

Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.

Huanjun Ding1, Sabee Molloi.   

Abstract

A simple and accurate measurement of breast density is crucial for the understanding of its impact in breast cancer risk models. The feasibility to quantify volumetric breast density with a photon-counting spectral mammography system has been investigated using both computer simulations and physical phantom studies. A computer simulation model involved polyenergetic spectra from a tungsten anode x-ray tube and a Si-based photon-counting detector has been evaluated for breast density quantification. The figure-of-merit (FOM), which was defined as the signal-to-noise ratio of the dual energy image with respect to the square root of mean glandular dose, was chosen to optimize the imaging protocols, in terms of tube voltage and splitting energy. A scanning multi-slit photon-counting spectral mammography system has been employed in the experimental study to quantitatively measure breast density using dual energy decomposition with glandular and adipose equivalent phantoms of uniform thickness. Four different phantom studies were designed to evaluate the accuracy of the technique, each of which addressed one specific variable in the phantom configurations, including thickness, density, area and shape. In addition to the standard calibration fitting function used for dual energy decomposition, a modified fitting function has been proposed, which brought the tube voltages used in the imaging tasks as the third variable in dual energy decomposition. For an average sized 4.5 cm thick breast, the FOM was maximized with a tube voltage of 46 kVp and a splitting energy of 24 keV. To be consistent with the tube voltage used in current clinical screening exam (∼32 kVp), the optimal splitting energy was proposed to be 22 keV, which offered a FOM greater than 90% of the optimal value. In the experimental investigation, the root-mean-square (RMS) error in breast density quantification for all four phantom studies was estimated to be approximately 1.54% using standard calibration function. The results from the modified fitting function, which integrated the tube voltage as a variable in the calibration, indicated a RMS error of approximately 1.35% for all four studies. The results of the current study suggest that photon-counting spectral mammography systems may potentially be implemented for an accurate quantification of volumetric breast density, with an RMS error of less than 2%, using the proposed dual energy imaging technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22771941      PMCID: PMC3478949          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/15/4719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  53 in total

1.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Automatic segmentation of mammographic density.

Authors:  R Sivaramakrishna; N A Obuchowski; W A Chilcote; K A Powell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors.

Authors:  John J Heine; Poonam Malhotra
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms.

Authors:  Olga Pawluczyk; Bindu J Augustine; Martin J Yaffe; Dan Rico; Jiwei Yang; Gordon E Mawdsley; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Viktor E Bovbjerg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Breast composition measurement with a cadmium-zinc-telluride based spectral computed tomography system.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States).

Authors:  C Byrne; C Schairer; L A Brinton; J Wolfe; N Parekh; M Salane; C Carter; R Hoover
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 9.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences.

Authors:  John J Heine; Poonam Malhotra
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.

Authors:  Biao Chen; Ruola Ning
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  13 in total

1.  Measurement of breast tissue composition with dual energy cone-beam computed tomography: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Energy weighting improves dose efficiency in clinical practice: implementation on a spectral photon-counting mammography system.

Authors:  Johan Berglund; Henrik Johansson; Mats Lundqvist; Björn Cederström; Erik Fredenberg
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-08-28

3.  Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Huanjun Ding; Stephen Feig
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Justin L Ducote; Huanjun Ding; Stephen A Feig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Volumetric breast density measurement: sensitivity analysis of a relative physics approach.

Authors:  Susie Lau; Kwan Hoong Ng; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Impact of errors in experimental parameters on reconstructed breast images using diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Bin Deng; Mats Lundqvist; Qianqian Fang; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Objective assessment of task performance: a comparison of two FFDM detectors using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Andrey Makeev; Lynda C Ikejimba; Jesse Salad; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-17

8.  Quantification of breast lesion compositions using low-dose spectral mammography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; David Sennung; Hyo-Min Cho; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography based on photon-counting detectors: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Feasibility study of a breast density measurement within a direct photon-counting mammography scanner system.

Authors:  Youichi Machida; Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Tamiko Yoshida; Ai Saita; Mari Yakabe; Kanae Nii
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.