Literature DB >> 11246838

Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States).

C Byrne1, C Schairer, L A Brinton, J Wolfe, N Parekh, M Salane, C Carter, R Hoover.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Having either a history of benign breast disease, particularly atypical hyperplasia or extensive mammographic breast density, is associated with increased breast cancer risk. Previous studies have described an association between benign breast disease histology and breast density. However, whether these features measure the same risk, or are independent risk factors, has not been addressed.
METHODS: This case-control study, nested within the prospective follow-up of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project, evaluated both benign histologic and mammographic density information from 347 women who later developed breast cancer and 410 age- and race-matched controls without breast cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analyses provided maximum-likelihood estimates of the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to evaluate the relative risk of breast cancer associated with each exposure.
RESULTS: Adjusting for mammographic density, the OR for atypical hyperplasia was 2.1 (95% CI: 1.3-3.6), and adjusting for benign breast histology, the OR for > or = 75% density was 3.8 (95% CI: 2.0-7.2). Women with nonproliferative benign breast disease and > or = 75% density had an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.8-18.6), and women with < 50% density and atypical hyperplasia had an OR of 4.1 (95% CI: 2.1-8.0).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, both benign breast disease histology and the percentage of the breast area with mammographic density were associated with breast cancer risk. However, women with both proliferative benign breast disease and > or = 75% density were not at as high a risk of breast cancer due to the combination of effects (p = 0.002) as women with only one of these factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11246838     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008935821885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  30 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: robust texture feature identification and equivalence across devices.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Andrew Oustimov; Yan Wang; Jinbo Chen; Raymond J Acciavatti; Yuanjie Zheng; Shonket Ray; James C Gee; Andrew D A Maidment; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-04-03

4.  No effect of aspirin on mammographic density in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Anne McTiernan; C Y Wang; Bess Sorensen; Liren Xiao; Diana S M Buist; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Emily White; Mary Anne Rossing; John Potter; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Combined associations of genetic and environmental risk factors: implications for prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Necdet Burak Gunsoy; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Fully Automated Convolutional Neural Network Method for Quantification of Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue and Background Parenchymal Enhancement.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Eralda Mema; Simukayi Mutasa; Jenika Karcich; Ralph T Wynn; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Conjugated equine estrogen influence on mammographic density in postmenopausal women in a substudy of the women's health initiative randomized trial.

Authors:  Anne McTiernan; Rowan T Chlebowski; Christopher Martin; Jennifer David Peck; Aaron Aragaki; Etta D Pisano; C Y Wang; Karen C Johnson; Joann E Manson; Robert B Wallace; Mara Z Vitolins; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Mammographic density, plasma vitamin D levels and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Angela K Green; Susan E Hankinson; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Genotypes and haplotypes in the insulin-like growth factors, their receptors and binding proteins in relation to plasma metabolic levels and mammographic density.

Authors:  Margarethe Biong; Inger T Gram; Ilene Brill; Fredrik Johansen; Hiroko K Solvang; Grethe I G Alnaes; Toril Fagerheim; Yngve Bremnes; Stephen J Chanock; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; Giske Ursin; Vessela N Kristensen
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Mammographic density and epithelial histopathologic markers.

Authors:  Martijn Verheus; Gertraud Maskarinec; Eva Erber; Jana S Steude; Jeffrey Killeen; Brenda Y Hernandez; J Mark Cline
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.