Literature DB >> 25086548

Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.

Sabee Molloi1, Justin L Ducote1, Huanjun Ding1, Stephen A Feig1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mammographic density has been shown to be an indicator of breast cancer risk and also reduces the sensitivity of screening mammography. Currently, there is no accepted standard for measuring breast density. Dual energy mammography has been proposed as a technique for accurate measurement of breast density. The purpose of this study is to validate its accuracy in postmortem breasts and compare it with other existing techniques.
METHODS: Forty postmortem breasts were imaged using a dual energy mammography system. Glandular and adipose equivalent phantoms of uniform thickness were used to calibrate a dual energy basis decomposition algorithm. Dual energy decomposition was applied after scatter correction to calculate breast density. Breast density was also estimated using radiologist reader assessment, standard histogram thresholding and a fuzzy C-mean algorithm. Chemical analysis was used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of different techniques to measure breast composition.
RESULTS: Breast density measurements using radiologist reader assessment, standard histogram thresholding, fuzzy C-mean algorithm, and dual energy were in good agreement with the measured fibroglandular volume fraction using chemical analysis. The standard error estimates using radiologist reader assessment, standard histogram thresholding, fuzzy C-mean, and dual energy were 9.9%, 8.6%, 7.2%, and 4.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that dual energy mammography can be used to accurately measure breast density. The variability in breast density estimation using dual energy mammography was lower than reader assessment rankings, standard histogram thresholding, and fuzzy C-mean algorithm. Improved quantification of breast density is expected to further enhance its utility as a risk factor for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086548      PMCID: PMC4119195          DOI: 10.1118/1.4890295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  61 in total

1.  Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.

Authors:  Regina J Hooley; Kathryn L Greenberg; Rebecca M Stackhouse; Jaime L Geisel; Reni S Butler; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Effect of compression paddle tilt correction on volumetric breast density estimation.

Authors:  Michiel G J Kallenberg; Carla H van Gils; Mariëtte Lokate; Gerard J den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano; Richard G Barr; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Mary C Mahoney; W Phil Evans; Linda H Larsen; Marilyn J Morton; Ellen B Mendelson; Dione M Farria; Jean B Cormack; Helga S Marques; Amanda Adams; Nolin M Yeh; Glenna Gabrielli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Puberty, body fat, and breast density in girls of several ethnic groups.

Authors:  Rachel Novotny; Yihe Daida; Yukiko Morimoto; John Shepherd; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 1.937

6.  Comparison of breast density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry with mammographic density among adult women in Hawaii.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Yukiko Morimoto; Yihe Daida; Aurelie Laidevant; Serghei Malkov; John A Shepherd; Rachel Novotny
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Volumetric lean percentage measurement using dual energy mammography.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Michael J Klopfer; S Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Diane L Nathan; Yan Wang; Yuanjie Zheng; James C Gee; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Carl J D'Orsi; David J Getty; Ronald M Pickett; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Mary S Newell; Kathleen R Gundry; Sandra R Bates; Robert M Nishikawa; Edward A Sickles; Andrew Karellas; Ellen M D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giulio Tagliafico; Davide Astengo; Sonia Airaldi; Massimo Calabrese; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  5 in total

1.  Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Huanjun Ding; Stephen Feig
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Volumetric breast density measurement: sensitivity analysis of a relative physics approach.

Authors:  Susie Lau; Kwan Hoong Ng; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Quantification of breast lesion compositions using low-dose spectral mammography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; David Sennung; Hyo-Min Cho; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography based on photon-counting detectors: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Shading artifact correction in breast CT using an interleaved deep learning segmentation and maximum-likelihood polynomial fitting approach.

Authors:  Peymon Ghazi; Andrew M Hernandez; Craig Abbey; Kai Yang; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 4.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.