Literature DB >> 29180718

Efficiency of genomic prediction of non-assessed single crosses.

José Marcelo Soriano Viana1, Helcio Duarte Pereira2, Gabriel Borges Mundim3, Hans-Peter Piepho4, Fabyano Fonseca E Silva5.   

Abstract

An important application of genomic selection in plant breeding is predicting untested single crosses (SCs). Most investigations on the prediction efficiency were based on tested SCs using cross-validation. The main objective was to assess the prediction efficiency by correlating the predicted and true genotypic values of untested SCs (accuracy) and measuring the efficacy of identification of the best 300 untested SCs (coincidence) using simulated data. We assumed 10,000 SNPs, 400 QTLs, two groups of 70 selected DH lines, and 4900 SCs. The heritabilities for the assessed SCs were 30, 60, and 100%. The scenarios included three sampling processes of DH lines, two sampling processes of SCs for testing, two SNP densities, DH lines from distinct and the same populations, DH lines from populations with lower LD, two genetic models, three statistical models, and three statistical approaches. We derived a model for genomic prediction based on SNP average effects of substitution and dominance deviations. The prediction accuracy is not affected by the linkage phase. The prediction of untested SCs is very efficient. The accuracies and coincidences ranged from ~0.8 and 0.5 at low heritability to 0.9 and 0.7 at high heritability, respectively. We also highlight the relevance of the overall LD and demonstrate that efficient prediction of untested SCs can be achieved for crops that show no heterotic pattern, for reduced training set size (10%), for SNP density of 1 cM, and for distinct sampling processes of DH lines based on random choice of the SCs for testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29180718      PMCID: PMC5842238          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-017-0027-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  14 in total

1.  Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genome properties and prospects of genomic prediction of hybrid performance in a breeding program of maize.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Tobias A Schrag; Wolfgang Schipprack; Eva Bauer; Henner Simianer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 4.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu; Dan Zhu; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genome-based prediction of maize hybrid performance across genetic groups, testers, locations, and years.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Valentin Wimmer; Joseph O Ogutu; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Hans-Peter Piepho; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genomic Prediction of Barley Hybrid Performance.

Authors:  Norman Philipp; Guozheng Liu; Yusheng Zhao; Sang He; Monika Spiller; Gunther Stiewe; Klaus Pillen; Jochen C Reif; Zuo Li
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Genome-Wide Prediction of the Performance of Three-Way Hybrids in Barley.

Authors:  Zuo Li; Norman Philipp; Monika Spiller; Gunther Stiewe; Jochen C Reif; Yusheng Zhao
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 9.  Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genomic Prediction of Single Crosses in the Early Stages of a Maize Hybrid Breeding Pipeline.

Authors:  Dnyaneshwar C Kadam; Sarah M Potts; Martin O Bohn; Alexander E Lipka; Aaron J Lorenz
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  10 in total

1.  Heritability in Plant Breeding on a Genotype-Difference Basis.

Authors:  Paul Schmidt; Jens Hartung; Jörn Bennewitz; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.

Authors:  Isadora Cristina Martins Oliveira; Arthur Bernardeli; José Henrique Soler Guilhen; Maria Marta Pastina
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Novel strategies for genomic prediction of untested single-cross maize hybrids using unbalanced historical data.

Authors:  K O G Dias; H P Piepho; L J M Guimarães; P E O Guimarães; S N Parentoni; M O Pinto; R W Noda; J V Magalhães; C T Guimarães; A A F Garcia; M M Pastina
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Modeling copy number variation in the genomic prediction of maize hybrids.

Authors:  Danilo Hottis Lyra; Giovanni Galli; Filipe Couto Alves; Ítalo Stefanine Correia Granato; Miriam Suzane Vidotti; Massaine Bandeira E Sousa; Júlia Silva Morosini; José Crossa; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Bayesian analysis and prediction of hybrid performance.

Authors:  Filipe Couto Alves; Ítalo Stefanine Correa Granato; Giovanni Galli; Danilo Hottis Lyra; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.993

6.  Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block patterns in popcorn populations.

Authors:  Andréa Carla Bastos Andrade; José Marcelo Soriano Viana; Helcio Duarte Pereira; Vitor Batista Pinto; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review.

Authors:  Marlee R Labroo; Anthony J Studer; Jessica E Rutkoski
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Phenotypic and molecular characterization of a set of tropical maize inbred lines from a public breeding program in Brazil.

Authors:  Sirlene Viana de Faria; Leandro Tonello Zuffo; Wemerson Mendonça Rezende; Diego Gonçalves Caixeta; Hélcio Duarte Pereira; Camila Ferreira Azevedo; Rodrigo Oliveira DeLima
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Combining datasets for maize root seedling traits increases the power of GWAS and genomic prediction accuracies.

Authors:  Leandro Tonello Zuffo; Rodrigo Oliveira DeLima; Thomas Lübberstedt
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.298

10.  Genomic Predictions Using Low-Density SNP Markers, Pedigree and GWAS Information: A Case Study with the Non-Model Species Eucalyptus cladocalyx.

Authors:  Paulina Ballesta; David Bush; Fabyano Fonseca Silva; Freddy Mora
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.