Literature DB >> 18704696

Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.

Mike Goddard1.   

Abstract

Genomic selection refers to the use of dense markers covering the whole genome to estimate the breeding value of selection candidates for a quantitative trait. This paper considers prediction of breeding value based on a linear combination of the markers. In this case the best estimate of each marker's effect is the expectation of the effect conditional on the data. To calculate this requires a prior distribution of marker effects. If the marker effects are normally distributed with constant variance, BLUP can be used to calculate the estimated effects of the markers and hence the estimated breeding value (EBV). In this case the model is equivalent to a conventional animal model in which the relationship matrix among the animals is estimated from the markers instead of the pedigree. The accuracy of the EBV can approach 1.0 but a very large amount of data is required. An alternative model was investigated in which only some markers have non-zero effects and these effects follow a reflected exponential distribution. In this case the expected effect of a marker is a non-linear function of the data such that apparently small effects are regressed back almost to zero and consequently these markers can be deleted from the model. The accuracy in this case is considerably higher than when marker effects are normally distributed. If genomic selection is practiced for several generations the response declines in a manner that can be predicted from the marker allele frequencies. Genomic selection is likely to lead to a more rapid decline in the selection response than phenotypic selection unless new markers are continually added to the prediction of breeding value. A method to find the optimum index to maximise long term selection response is derived. This index varies the weight given to a marker according to its frequency such that markers where the favourable allele has low frequency receive more weight in the index.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18704696     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  26 in total

Review 1.  Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Palliating the impact of fixation of a major gene on the genetic variation of artificially selected polygenes.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sánchez; Armando Caballero; Enrique Santiago
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Selection indices for non-linear profit functions.

Authors:  M E Goddard
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Optimal properties of the conditional mean as a selection criterion.

Authors:  R L Fernando; D Gianola
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The distribution of the proportion of the genome which is homozygous by descent in inbred individuals.

Authors:  I R Franklin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma.

Authors:  Miriam F Moffatt; Michael Kabesch; Liming Liang; Anna L Dixon; David Strachan; Simon Heath; Martin Depner; Andrea von Berg; Albrecht Bufe; Ernst Rietschel; Andrea Heinzmann; Burkard Simma; Thomas Frischer; Saffron A G Willis-Owen; Kenny C C Wong; Thomas Illig; Christian Vogelberg; Stephan K Weiland; Erika von Mutius; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Martin Farrall; Ivo G Gut; G Mark Lathrop; William O C Cookson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  350 in total

1.  Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Reanalyses of the historical series of UK variety trials to quantify the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to trends and variability in yield over time.

Authors:  I Mackay; A Horwell; J Garner; J White; J McKee; H Philpott
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies.

Authors:  Joseph E Powell; Peter M Visscher; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.

Authors:  Alireza Nazarian; Salvador A Gezan
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Piter Bijma; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Development and validation of a small SNP panel for feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Authors:  M K Abo-Ismail; N Lansink; E Akanno; B K Karisa; J J Crowley; S S Moore; E Bork; P Stothard; J A Basarab; G S Plastow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Use of whole-genome sequence data and novel genomic selection strategies to improve selection for age at puberty in tropically-adapted beef heifers.

Authors:  Christie L Warburton; Bailey N Engle; Elizabeth M Ross; Roy Costilla; Stephen S Moore; Nicholas J Corbet; Jack M Allen; Alan R Laing; Geoffry Fordyce; Russell E Lyons; Michael R McGowan; Brian M Burns; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.