Literature DB >> 32680885

Accounting for Group-Specific Allele Effects and Admixture in Genomic Predictions: Theory and Experimental Evaluation in Maize.

Simon Rio1, Laurence Moreau1, Alain Charcosset1, Tristan Mary-Huard2,3.   

Abstract

Populations structured into genetic groups may display group-specific linkage disequilibrium, mutations, and/or interactions between quantitative trait loci and the genetic background. These factors lead to heterogeneous marker effects affecting the efficiency of genomic prediction, especially for admixed individuals. Such individuals have a genome that is a mosaic of chromosome blocks from different origins, and may be of interest to combine favorable group-specific characteristics. We developed two genomic prediction models adapted to the prediction of admixed individuals in presence of heterogeneous marker effects: multigroup admixed genomic best linear unbiased prediction random individual (MAGBLUP-RI), modeling the ancestry of alleles; and multigroup admixed genomic best linear unbiased prediction random allele effect (MAGBLUP-RAE), modeling group-specific distributions of allele effects. MAGBLUP-RI can estimate the segregation variance generated by admixture while MAGBLUP-RAE can disentangle the variability that is due to main allele effects from the variability that is due to group-specific deviation allele effects. Both models were evaluated for their genomic prediction accuracy using a maize panel including lines from the Dent and Flint groups, along with admixed individuals. Based on simulated traits, both models proved their efficiency to improve genomic prediction accuracy compared to standard GBLUP models. For real traits, a clear gain was observed at low marker densities whereas it became limited at high marker densities. The interest of including admixed individuals in multigroup training sets was confirmed using simulated traits, but was variable using real traits. Both MAGBLUP models and admixed individuals are of interest whenever group-specific SNP allele effects exist.
Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Admixture; GenPred; Genetic Structure; Genomic Prediction; Shared Data Resources

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32680885      PMCID: PMC7463286          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  51 in total

Review 1.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.

Authors:  A Toosi; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Estimation of the relatedness coefficients from biallelic markers, application in plant mating designs.

Authors:  Fabien Laporte; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Dent and Flint maize diversity panels reveal important genetic potential for increasing biomass production.

Authors:  R Rincent; S Nicolas; S Bouchet; T Altmann; D Brunel; P Revilla; R A Malvar; J Moreno-Gonzalez; L Campo; A E Melchinger; W Schipprack; E Bauer; C-C Schoen; N Meyer; M Ouzunova; P Dubreuil; C Giauffret; D Madur; V Combes; F Dumas; C Bauland; P Jamin; J Laborde; P Flament; L Moreau; A Charcosset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Comparison of joint versus purebred genomic evaluation in the French multi-breed dairy goat population.

Authors:  Céline Carillier; Hélène Larroque; Christèle Robert-Granié
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Case-control association testing in the presence of unknown relationships.

Authors:  Yoonha Choi; Ellen M Wijsman; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Disentangling group specific QTL allele effects from genetic background epistasis using admixed individuals in GWAS: An application to maize flowering.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Cyril Bauland; Carine Palaffre; Delphine Madur; Valérie Combes; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Genomic prediction of northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize with combined or separated training sets for heterotic groups.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Anna Bürger; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.

Authors:  Sofiene Karoui; María Jesús Carabaño; Clara Díaz; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.

Authors:  Laercio R Porto-Neto; William Barendse; John M Henshall; Sean M McWilliam; Sigrid A Lehnert; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  6 in total

1.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Optimal breeding-value prediction using a sparse selection index.

Authors:  Marco Lopez-Cruz; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Combining genetic resources and elite material populations to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction in apple.

Authors:  Xabi Cazenave; Bernard Petit; Marc Lateur; Hilde Nybom; Jiri Sedlak; Stefano Tartarini; François Laurens; Charles-Eric Durel; Hélène Muranty
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.542

4.  Improving the Accuracy of Multi-Breed Prediction in Admixed Populations by Accounting for the Breed Origin of Haplotype Segments.

Authors:  Markus Schmid; Joana Stock; Jörn Bennewitz; Robin Wellmann
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Multi-generation genomic prediction of maize yield using parametric and non-parametric sparse selection indices.

Authors:  Marco Lopez-Cruz; Yoseph Beyene; Manje Gowda; Jose Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Can Cross-Country Genomic Predictions Be a Reasonable Strategy to Support Germplasm Exchange? - A Case Study With Hydrogen Cyanide in Cassava.

Authors:  Lívia Gomes Torres; Eder Jorge de Oliveira; Alex C Ogbonna; Guillaume J Bauchet; Lukas A Mueller; Camila Ferreira Azevedo; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva; Guilherme Ferreira Simiqueli; Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.