Literature DB >> 23982591

Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle.

Christian Riedelsheimer1, Albrecht E Melchinger.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: We developed a universally applicable planning tool for optimizing the allocation of resources for one cycle of genomic selection in a biparental population. The framework combines selection theory with constraint numerical optimization and considers genotype  ×  environment interactions. Genomic selection (GS) is increasingly implemented in plant breeding programs to increase selection gain but little is known how to optimally allocate the resources under a given budget. We investigated this problem with model calculations by combining quantitative genetic selection theory with constraint numerical optimization. We assumed one selection cycle where both the training and prediction sets comprised double haploid (DH) lines from the same biparental population. Grain yield for testcrosses of maize DH lines was used as a model trait but all parameters can be adjusted in a freely available software implementation. An extension of the expected selection accuracy given by Daetwyler et al. (2008) was developed to correctly balance between the number of environments for phenotyping the training set and its population size in the presence of genotype × environment interactions. Under small budget, genotyping costs mainly determine whether GS is superior over phenotypic selection. With increasing budget, flexibility in resource allocation increases greatly but selection gain leveled off quickly requiring balancing the number of populations with the budget spent for each population. The use of an index combining phenotypic and GS predicted values in the training set was especially beneficial under limited resources and large genotype × environment interactions. Once a sufficiently high selection accuracy is achieved in the prediction set, further selection gain can be achieved most efficiently by massively expanding its size. Thus, with increasing budget, reducing the costs for producing a DH line becomes increasingly crucial for successfully exploiting the benefits of GS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23982591     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2175-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  26 in total

1.  Quantitative trait locus mapping based on resampling in a vast maize testcross experiment and its relevance to quantitative genetics for complex traits.

Authors:  Chris C Schön; H Friedrich Utz; Susanne Groh; Bernd Truberg; Steve Openshaw; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.

Authors:  Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects.

Authors:  A E Melchinger; H F Utz; C C Schön
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy.

Authors:  Yi Jia; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Jeffrey B Endelman; Michael Stange; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Rapid and accurate identification of in vivo-induced haploid seeds based on oil content in maize.

Authors:  Albrecht E Melchinger; Wolfgang Schipprack; Tobias Würschum; Shaojiang Chen; Frank Technow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison of whole-genome prediction models for traits with contrasting genetic architecture in a diversity panel of maize inbred lines.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  19 in total

1.  Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Christian Riedelsheimer; H Friedrich Utz; Chris-Carolin Schön; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genomic selection in wheat: optimum allocation of test resources and comparison of breeding strategies for line and hybrid breeding.

Authors:  C Friedrich H Longin; Xuefei Mi; Tobias Würschum
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Shrinkage estimation of the genomic relationship matrix can improve genomic estimated breeding values in the training set.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Optimum breeding strategies using genomic selection for hybrid breeding in wheat, maize, rye, barley, rice and triticale.

Authors:  Jose J Marulanda; Xuefei Mi; Albrecht E Melchinger; Jian-Long Xu; T Würschum; C Friedrich H Longin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Analyzing the Economic Effectiveness of Genomic Selection Relative to Conventional Breeding Approaches.

Authors:  Aline Fugeray-Scarbel; Sarah Ben-Sadoun; Sophie Bouchet; Stéphane Lemarié
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 7.  Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: a review.

Authors:  C Anilkumar; N C Sunitha; Narayana Bhat Devate; S Ramesh
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Genomic prediction with multiple biparental families.

Authors:  Pedro C Brauner; Dominik Müller; Willem S Molenaar; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Prospects and limits of marker imputation in quantitative genetic studies in European elite wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Sang He; Yusheng Zhao; M Florian Mette; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Timothy F Sharbel; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Using Bayesian Multilevel Whole Genome Regression Models for Partial Pooling of Training Sets in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Frank Technow; L Radu Totir
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.