Literature DB >> 23385660

Genomic prediction of dichotomous traits with Bayesian logistic models.

Frank Technow1, Albrecht E Melchinger.   

Abstract

Bayesian methods are a popular choice for genomic prediction of genotypic values. The methodology is well established for traits with approximately Gaussian phenotypic distribution. However, numerous important traits are of dichotomous nature and the phenotypic counts observed follow a Binomial distribution. The standard Gaussian generalized linear models (GLM) are not statistically valid for this type of data. Therefore, we implemented Binomial GLM with logit link function for the BayesB and Bayesian GBLUP genomic prediction methods. We compared these models with their standard Gaussian counterparts using two experimental data sets from plant breeding, one on female fertility in wheat and one on haploid induction in maize, as well as a simulated data set. With the aid of the simulated data referring to a bi-parental population of doubled haploid lines, we further investigated the influence of training set size (N), number of independent Bernoulli trials for trait evaluation (n i ) and genetic architecture of the trait on genomic prediction accuracies and abilities in general and on the relative performance of our models. For BayesB, we in addition implemented finite mixture Binomial GLM to account for overdispersion. We found that prediction accuracies increased with increasing N and n i . For the simulated and experimental data sets, we found Binomial GLM to be superior to Gaussian models for small n i , but that for large n i Gaussian models might be used as ad hoc approximations. We further show with simulated and real data sets that accounting for overdispersion in Binomial data can markedly increase the prediction accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23385660     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2041-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  20 in total

1.  New insights into the genetics of in vivo induction of maternal haploids, the backbone of doubled haploid technology in maize.

Authors:  Vanessa Prigge; Xiaowei Xu; Liang Li; Raman Babu; Shaojiang Chen; Gary N Atlin; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Tobias A Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.

Authors:  T M Villumsen; L Janss; M S Lund
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Back to basics for Bayesian model building in genomic selection.

Authors:  Hanni P Kärkkäinen; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A major locus expressed in the male gametophyte with incomplete penetrance is responsible for in situ gynogenesis in maize.

Authors:  P Barret; M Brinkmann; M Beckert
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Estimating missing heritability for disease from genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Sang Hong Lee; Naomi R Wray; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Jennie Pryce; Amanda J Chamberlain; Phil J Bowman; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Samuel A Clark; John M Hickey; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  9 in total

1.  QTL mapping of stalk bending strength in a recombinant inbred line maize population.

Authors:  Haixiao Hu; Wenxin Liu; Zhiyi Fu; Linda Homann; Frank Technow; Hongwu Wang; Chengliang Song; Shitu Li; Albrecht E Melchinger; Shaojiang Chen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genome properties and prospects of genomic prediction of hybrid performance in a breeding program of maize.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Tobias A Schrag; Wolfgang Schipprack; Eva Bauer; Henner Simianer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Fine mapping of qhir1 influencing in vivo haploid induction in maize.

Authors:  X Dong; X Xu; J Miao; L Li; D Zhang; X Mi; C Liu; X Tian; A E Melchinger; S Chen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genomic models with genotype × environment interaction for predicting hybrid performance: an application in maize hybrids.

Authors:  Rocío Acosta-Pech; José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Simon Teyssèdre; Bruno Claustres; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Carlos D Messina; L Radu Totir; Mark Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Improving the computational efficiency of fully Bayes inference and assessing the effect of misspecification of hyperparameters in whole-genome prediction models.

Authors:  Wenzhao Yang; Chunyu Chen; Robert J Tempelman
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  An R Package for Bayesian Analysis of Multi-environment and Multi-trait Multi-environment Data for Genome-Based Prediction.

Authors:  Osval A Montesinos-López; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Francisco Javier Luna-Vázquez; Fernando H Toledo; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Morten Lillemo; José Crossa
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Using Genome-Wide Predictions to Assess the Phenotypic Variation of a Barley (Hordeum sp.) Gene Bank Collection for Important Agronomic Traits and Passport Information.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Stephan Weise; Andreas Graner; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Genomic selection across multiple breeding cycles in applied bread wheat breeding.

Authors:  Sebastian Michel; Christian Ametz; Huseyin Gungor; Doru Epure; Heinrich Grausgruber; Franziska Löschenberger; Hermann Buerstmayr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.699

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.